CAN GOOD GOVERNANCE ENHANCE LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2023.v7.i1.5231Keywords:
audit finding, audit rectification, good governance, local government performance, panel data analysisAbstract
The first objective of this study is to examine the effect of audit results on the local government performance. Secondly is examining the moderating role of good governance on the relationship between audit results and local government performance. This study collected 536 local governments data from 134 local authorities in Indonesia from 2016 to 2019. The data employed for audit results were extracted from findings and rectification of audit reports. For the Good Governance, this study develops the Good Governance Principles index by mapping the data taken from Evaluation of Local Government Performance by the Ministry of Home Affairs RI with IGI indicators. Meanwhile, the local government performances were measured using the total local own revenue. This study uses multiple moderated regression analyses to explain the relationship between the audit results and good governance on local government performance. As the result, it has a significant effect on both variables tested. This research also found a significant interaction between audit results and good governance on local government. These results assert that good governance enhances local government to be more effective in responding to audit results to improve their performances in the following years.
References
Addink, H. 2019. Good Governance Concept and Context (First Edition). Oxford University Press. United Kingdom.
Adriana, A. and I. T. Ritonga. 2018. Analysis of Local Financial Management Transparency Based on Websites on Local Government in Java. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi 10(1): 13–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jda.v10i1.12558.
Afiah, N. N. and P. C. Azwari. 2015. The Effect of the Implementation of Government Internal Control System (GICS) on the Quality of Financial Reporting of the Local Government and its Impact on the Principles of Good Governance: A Research in District, City, and Provincial Government in Sou. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 211: 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.172.
Akbar, R., R. A. Pilcher, and B. Perrin. 2015. Implementing Performance Measurement Systems: Indonesian Local Government under Pressure. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management 12(1): 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-03-2013-0013.
Amyulianthy, R., R. Muda, J. Said, and D. Setyaningrum. 2021. Examining The Moderating Role of Performance Measurement System on Relationship Between Audit Results and Performance of Indonesian Local Authorities. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government 27(1): 2040–2058.
Artha, R. D., P. B. Basuki, and M. T. Alamsyah. 2015. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah dan Temuan Audit BPK terhadap Kinerja Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Pemerintah Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi NTB). Jurnal InFestasi 11(2): 214–230.
Azhar, K. 2015. Pengaruh Temuan dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan BPK Terhadap Korupsi Kementerian Lembaga di Indonesia. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.
Koledoye, B. O. 2017. Achieving Good Governance and Development in Nigeria Through Decentralization : A Case Study of Ondo State Achieving Good Governance and Development in Nigeria through Decentralization : A Case Study of Ondo State By. Dissertation. Swansea University. Wales, United Kingdom.
Kolstad, I. and A. Wiig. 2009. Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries? World Development 37(3): 521-532.
Biørn, E. 2017. Econometrics of Panel Data Methods and Applications. Oxford University Press. United Kingdom.
BPK. 2018. BPK Summary of Audit Report Semester 1 2018. Indeks Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester 1 Tahun 2018.
Cordery, C. J. and D. Hay. 2019. Supreme Audit Institutions and Public Value: Demonstrating Relevance. Financial Accountability & Management 35(2): 128-142.
Diaz, G. R. 2017. The Contractual and Administrative Regulation of Public-Private Partnership. Utilities Policy 48: 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.04.011.
Din, M., Munawarah, I. Ghozali, and T. Achmad. 2017. The Follow up of Auditing Results, Accountability of Financial Reporting and Mediating Effect of Financial Loss Rate: an Empirical Study in Indonesian Local Governments. European Research Studies Journal 20(4): 443–459.
Fitriani, A. N. and D. Setyaningrum. 2018. Measurement and Implementation of Participation Principle in Indonesia’s Local Government. CELSciTech towards Downstream and Commercialization of Research 3(2013): 100–111.
Furqan, A. C., R. Wardhani, D. Martani, and D. Setyaningrum. 2020. The Effect of Audit Findings and Audit Recommendation Follow-Up on the Financial Report and Public Service Quality in Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Management 33(4): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2019-0173.
Hartanto, D., J. Dalle, A. Akrim, and H. U. Anisah. 2021. Perceived Effectiveness of E-governance as an Underlying Mechanism between Good Governance and Public Trust: a Case of Indonesia. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 23(6): 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-03-2021-0046.
Hay, D. and C. Cordery. 2018. The Value of Public Sector Audit : Literature and History. Journal of Accounting Literature 40(November 2017): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2017.11.001.
Heriningsih, S. 2015. Analisis Kinerja Penyelenggara Pemerintah Daerah dan Tingkat Korupsi Dianalisis dari Opini Auditor. University Research Colloquium 2015: 86-95.
Hussein, N., S. Omar, F. Noordin, and N. A. Ishak. 2016. Learning Organization Culture, Organizational Performance and Organizational Innovativeness in a Public Institution of Higher Education in Malaysia : A Preliminary Study. Procedia Economics and Finance 37(16): 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30159-9.
Jurnali, T. and A. K. Siti-Nabiha. 2015. Performance Management System for Local Government: The Indonesian Experience. Global Business Review 16(3): 351-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915569923.
Gismar, A. M., I. Loekman, L. Hidayat, N. Harjanto, D. S. Suharmawijaya, H. Sulistio, and R. N. Aritonang. 2013. Indonesia Governance Index 2012: Towards a Well-informed Society and Responsive Government. Kemitraan bagi Pembaruan Tata Pemerintahan.
Kostovetsky, L. 2015. Political Capital and Moral Hazard. Journal of Financial Economics 116(1): 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.12.003.
Lei, L., S. Dino, Y. Song, and K. Wang. 2015. Accounting Fraud, Auditing, and the Role of Government Sanctions in China. Journal of Business Research 68(6): 1186–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.013.
Lestiawan, H. Y. and B. Jatmiko. 2016. Key Success Factor Good Government Governance serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah (Survey pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Gunungkidul). Maksimum 5(1): 32–49.
Lisic, L. L., S. D. Silveri, Y. Song, and K. Wang. 2015. Accounting Fraud, Auditing, and the Role of Government Sanctions in China. Journal of Business Research 68(6): 1186–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.013.
Liu, J. and B. Lin. 2014. Government Auditing and Corruption Control: Evidence from China’s Provincial Panel Data. China Journal of Accounting Research 5(2): 163–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2014.01.002.
Marfiana, N. and L. Kurniasih. 2013. Pengaruh Karakteristik Pemerintah Daerah dan Hasil Pemeriksaan Audit BPK terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten/Kota. Journal & Proceeding Universitas Jenderal Soedirman 3(1): 1–16.
Marwan, A., D. O. C. Garduno, and F. Bonfigli. 2022. Detection of Digital Law Issues and Implication for Good Governance Policy in Indonesia. Bestuur 10(1): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v10i1.59143.
Masdiantini, P. R. and N. M. A. Erawati. 2016. Pengaruh Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Pengaruh Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Kemakmuran, Intergovernmental Revenue, Temuan dan Opini Audit BPK pada Kinerja Keuangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 14(2): 1150–1182.
Masyitoh, R. D., R. Wardhani, and D. Setyaningrum. 2015. Pengaruh Opini Audit, Temuan Audit, dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Audit terhadap Persepsi Korupsi pada Pemerintah Daerah Tingkat II Tahun 2008-2010. Seminar Nasional Akuntansi 18 Universitas Sumatera Utara Medan: 1–26.
Mir, M., H. Fan, and I. Maclean. 2017. Public Sector Audit in the Absence of Political Competition. Managerial Auditing Journal 32(9): 899-923. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-03-2016-1357.
Nofianti, L. and N. S. Suseno. 2015. Factors Affecting Implementation of Good Government Governance (GGG) and their Implications towards Performance Accountability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164(August): 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.056.
Nurhanifah and D. Setyaningrum. 2021. The Implementation of Good Public Governance in the Bureaucratic Arena in the Indonesian Ministry. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 10(1): 153–166.
Raudla, R., K. Taro, C. Agu, and J. W. Douglas. 2016. The Impact of Performance Audit on Public Sector Organizations: The Case of Estonia. Public Organization Review 16(2): 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0308-0.
Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. and S. I. Vabo. 2017. Performance Audit as a Contributor to Change and Improvement in Public Administration. Evaluation 23(1): 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016683871.
Rossieta, H., A. Muktiyanto, and I. Geraldina. 2020. Tata Kelola Sektor Publik. Universitas Terbuka. Tangerang Selatan.
Rusydi, M. K. and H. Rossieta. 2015. Good Public Governance Dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia. Proceeding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 18 Medan: 1–18.
Said, J., M. M. Alam, and M. A. Khalid. 2016. Relationship between Good Governance and Integrity System: Empirical Study on the Public Sector of Malaysia. Humanomics 32(2): 1–19.
Saraswati, D. 2019. Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Ukuran Pemerintah Daerah, Leverage, Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis dan Publik 9(2): 110-120.
Sari, A. P., Martani, D., and D. Setyaningrum. 2013. Pengaruh Temuan Audit, Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan dan Kualitas Sumber Daya Manusia terhadap Opini Audit melalui Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan Kementerian/Lembaga. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII Medan.
Setyaningrum, D. 2017. Proposing Accountability Index for Indonesia’s Local Government. 6th International Accounting Conference (IAC 2017): 54-58. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iac-17.2018.10.
Setyaningrum, D., L. Gani, D. Martani, and C. Kuntadi. 2013. The Effect of Auditor Quality on the Follow-Up of Audit Recommendation. International Research Journal of Business Studies 6(2): 89–104. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.6.2.89-104.
Setyaningrum, D. and D. Martani. 2018. Determinants of Local Government Performance in Indonesia.Pdf. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 55(IAC 2017): 7–12.
Setyaningrum, D. and H. A. Saragih. 2019. Political Dynasties and the Moderating Role of Good Public Governance. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi 8(2): 135–144.
Setyaningrum, D., R. Wardhani, and A. Syakhroza. 2017. Good Public Governance, Corruption and Public Service Quality : Indonesia Evidence. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research 15(19): 327–338.
Shakya, R. K. 2015. Good Government in Public Procurement: An Evaluation of The Role of An E-Procurement System. Dissertation. Capella University. Minneapolis, Amerika Serikat.
Suhardjanto, D., M. Syarifuddin, R. P. Andini, and M. W. Rahmatika. 2018. Accountability and Corruption Level of Provincial Government in Indonesia. Review of Integrative Business & Economics Research 7(3): 281–296.
Sukmadilaga, C., A. Pratama, and S. Mulyani. 2015. Good Governance Implementation in Public Sector: Exploratory Analysis of Government Financial Statements Disclosures Across ASEAN Countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 211(September): 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.068.
Trisha, G. F. 2020. Pengaruh Desentralisasi Fiskal, Politik Dinasti, dan Jumlah Pelanggaran Sistem Pengendalian Internal terhadap Akuntabilitas Pelaporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah dengan Variabel Kinerja sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.
Umar, H., Erlina, A. Fauziah, and R. Br. Purba. 2018. Audit Quality Determinants and The Relation of Fraud Detection. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) 10(03): 1447-1460.
Umor, S., Z. Zakaria, and N. A. Sulaiman. 2016. Follow-up Audit as an Accountability Mechanism of Public Sector Performance Auditing. International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS) 2016 15-18 August. Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia.
UNDP. 2018. Governance Principles, Institutional Capacity and Quality. In United Nations Development Programme (Vol. 08, Issue 14). https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2018.814196.
Verbeeten, F. H. M. and R. F. Speklé. 2015. Management Control, Results-Oriented Culture and Public Sector Performance: Empirical Evidence on New Public Management. Organization Studies 36(7): 953–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615580014.
Wardhani, R., H. Rossieta, D. Martani, and S. Djamaluddin. 2017. The Role of Good Governance in Public Sector in Increasing the Government Expenditure Efficiency and Performance of Local Government: The Case of Indonesia. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management 3(1): 77-102.
Zhang, X. 2019. Good Governance, Good Enough Governance and Governance with Rights First. Dissertation. University of California. California, Amerika Serikat.
