STRATEGI MENINGKATKAN KEPATUHAN PAJAK REKLAME DENGAN PENDEKATAN COMPLIANCE MODEL

Authors

  • Wijayanah Wijayanah Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya
  • Basuki Basuki Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2021.v5.i4.4869

Keywords:

model kepatuhan, strategi kepatuhan, pajak reklame

Abstract

This study aims to describe the implementation of compliance strategies in revenue agencies using the compliance model approach to improve advertising tax compliance. The research data were collected by interview, observation and document collection. This research is a descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach. Data analysis was performed using qualitative techniques, consisted of 3 stages, namely data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study provide empirical evidence that compliance strategy with a compliance model approach that is implemented comprehensively and adequately can increase taxpayer compliance. The strategy implemented includes providing ease of compliance, providing assistance to comply, taking deter by detection and use full force of the law. Its combines effective prevention strategies and credible enforcement, making easier for taxpayers who are committed to comply and take firm action against taxpayers who do not comply. Implementation of compliance strategy requires support of facilities and infrastructure, competent human resources, tax authorities commitment, laws and regulations as a basis for implementation and support from other agencies in law enforcement efforts. The results of this study can become a reference for policy makers in developing future compliance strategies to achieve voluntary compliance in a sustainable manner.

References

Aditya, T. dan A. C. Pohan. 2018. Analisis Pelaksanaan Strategi Peningkatan Penerimaan Pajak Reklame pada Unit Pelayanan Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah Cempaka Putih Tahun 2014-2016. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi 5(1): 27-39.

Alm, J. 2018. What Motivates Tax Compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys 33(2): 353–388.

Alm, J., E. Kirchler, dan S. Muehlbacher. 2012. Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: from Enforcement to Cooperation. Economic Analysis & Policy 42: 133–151.

Amalia, F. A. 2019. Slippery Slope Framework: Motivasi Pembayaran Pajak dan kepatuhan Pajak. EL MUHASABA: Jurnal Akuntansi (e-Journal) 12(1): 92-101.

Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan dan Pajak Daerah Kota Surabaya. 2021. Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Tahun 2017 sampai dengan Tahun 2020.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Distribusi PDRB Kota Surabaya Atas Dasar Harga Berlaku Menurut Lapangan Usaha, 2010-2020. https://surabayakota.bps.go.id. Diakses Tanggal 20 February 2021.

Braithwite, V. 2016. Taxing Democracy: Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion (V. Braitwaite (ed.)). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. UK.

Chirico, M., R. P. Inman, C. Loeffler, J. MacDonald, dan H. Sieg. 2016. An Experimental Evaluation of Notification Strategies to Increase Property Tax Compliance: Free-Riding in the City of Brotherly Love. Tax Policy and the Economy 30(1): 129-161.

Cleary, D. 2011. Predictive Analytics in the Public Sector: Using Data Mining to Assist better Target Selection for Audit. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Government, ECEG 9(2): 168–176.

Cyan, M. R., A. M. Koumpias, dan J. Martinez-Vazquez. 2017. The Effects of Mass Media Campaigns on Individual Attitudes towards Tax Compliance; Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Survey Data in Pakistan. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 70: 10–22.

D’Ascenzo, M. 2015. Modernising the Australian Taxation Office: Vision, People, Systems and Values. EJournal of Tax Research 13(1): 361–377.

Farida, A. dan W. David. 2018. Tax Costs and Tax Compliance Behaviour in Kenya. Journal of Accounting and Taxation 10(1): 1–18.

Gangl, K., B. Torgler, E. Kirchler, dan E. Hofmann. 2014. Effects of Supervision on Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Austria. Economics Letters 123(3): 378–382.

Gemmell, N. dan M. Ratto. 2012. Behavioral Responses to Taxpayer Audits: Evidence from Random Taxpayer Inquiries. National Tax Journal 65(1): 33–58.

Gonzalez, P. C. dan J. D. Velasquez. 2013. Characterization and Detection of Taxpayers with False Invoices using Data Mining Techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 40(5): 1427–1436.

Hamilton, S. 2012. New Dimensions in Regulatory Compliance - Building the Bridge to Better Compliance. EJournal of Tax Research 10(2): 483–531.

Hassan, N., A. Nawawi, dan A. S. A. P. Salin. 2016. Improving Tax Compliance Via Tax Education - Malaysian Experience. Malaysian Accounting Review 15(2): 1–15.

Jaffar, R., K. Che Ku Yusof, M. Abu Bakar, dan I. Mohd Tahir. 2014. A Study on Tax Non-Compliance among Government Servants. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 8(5): 84–90.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2018. Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 207/PMK.07/2018 tentang Pedoman Penagihan dan Pemeriksaan Pajak Daerah.

Kementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia. 2021. Data APBD Seluruh Indonesia. http://www.djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/portal/data/apbd. Diakses Tanggal 22 Februari 2021.

Kosonen, T. dan O. Ropponen. 2015. The Role of Information in Tax Compliance: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment. Economics Letters 129: 18–21.

Kustiawan, M., H. Zulhaimi, dan I. Solikin. 2019. Strategic Effort to Improve Tax Compliance. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research 65: 81–84.

Lisi, G. 2015. Tax Morale, Tax Compliance and the Optimal Tax Policy. Economic Analysis and Policy 45: 27–32.

Mahmood, M. 2012. Compliance Risk Management Strategies for Tax Administrations in Developing Countries: a Case Study of the Malaysian Revenue Authority. Disertasi. University of Warwick. England.

Mangoting, Y., C. Christopher, N. Kriwango, dan W. Adriyani. 2020. Interaksi Komitmen dalam Dinamika Kepatuhan Pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 11(2): 265–277.

Musimenta, D. 2020. Knowledge Requirements, Tax Complexity, Compliance Costs and Tax Compliance in Uganda. Cogent Business and Management 7(1): 1–20.

Nalle, P. F. 2017. Efektifitas Penagihan Pajak dengan Surat Teguran dan Surat Paksa Terhadap Peneriman Pajak. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 20(02): 1648–1671.

Permatasari, N. P. M. S. D. dan N. K. L. Aryani. 2019. Pengaruh Kesadaran, Kualitas Pelayanan, Pengetahuan Perpajakan, dan Sanksi Perpajakan pada Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Reklame. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 28: 748–773.

Randlane, K. 2016. Tax Compliance as a System: Mapping the Field. International Journal of Public Administration 39(7): 515–525.

Sapiei, N. S. dan J. Kasipillai. 2013. External Tax Professionals’ Views on Compliance Behaviour of Corporation. American Journal of Economics 3(2): 82–89.

Susanti, S., J. Susilowibowo, dan H. T. Hardini. 2020. Apakah Pengetahuan Pajak dan Tingkat Pendidikan Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Membayar Pajak? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 11(2): 420–431.

Tambunan, B. 2016. Efektivitas Penagihan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 21 Terhadap Penerimaan Pajak Melalui Surat Paksa (Studi Kasus Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama (Kpp) Medan Petisah). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis 2(2): 159–174.

Yunus, N., R. Ramli, dan N. S. Abu Hasan. 2017. Tax Penalties and Tax Compliance of Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 12(1): 81–91.

Published

2021-12-31

Issue

Section

Artikel