PENGARUH PENDIDIKAN, PELATIHAN, DAN PENGALAMAN TERHADAP SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2020.v4.i2.4376Keywords:
Pendidikan, Pelatihan, Pengalaman, Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor, Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP)Abstract
Professional skepticism is needed by auditors to detect indications of audit fraud and risk. This study aims to examine the effect of education, training, and experience on auditor professional skepticism. This research is based on the theory of cognitive dissonance. The object of this study is the auditor who works at the Public Accounting Firm in Indonesia. Data were collected through a questionnaire and processed using multiple linear regression analysis methods. The test results show that education and experience have a significant positive effect on the level of professional skepticism of auditors. On the other hand, training does not affect the level of auditor professional skepticism. This research provides advice on the development of HR in Public Accounting Firm and curriculum development in educational institutions related to efforts to introduce and add insight to accounting students regarding the importance of applying professional skepticism.
Skeptisisme profesional diperlukan oleh auditor untuk mendeteksi indikasi kecurangan dan risiko audit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh pendidikan, pelatihan, dan pengalaman terhadap skeptisisme profesional auditor. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada teori disonansi kognitif. Objek penelitian ini adalah auditor yang bekerja pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan diolah menggunakan metode analisis regresi linear berganda. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa pendidikan dan pengalaman berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap tingkat skeptisisme profesional pada auditor. Sedangkan pelatihan tidak berpengaruh terhadap tingkat skeptisisme professional auditor. Penelitian ini memberikan saran terhadap pengembangan SDM di KAP dan pengembangan kurikulum di lembaga pendidikan terkait dengan usaha memperkenalkan dan menambah wawasan kepada mahasiswa akuntansi mengenai pentingnya penerapan skeptisisme profesional.
References
AICPA. 2007. Due Profesional Care in the Performance of Work. In PCAOB Standards and Related Rules (p. Section 230). New York.
Anisma, Y., Z. Abidin, dan Christina. 2011. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Sikap Skeptisme Profesional Seorang Auditor pada KAP di Sumatera. Pekbis Jurnal 3(2): 490-497.
Ansah, S., G. Moyes, P. Oyelere, dan D. Hay. 2002. An Empirical Analysis of the Likelihood of Detecting Fraud in New Zealand. Managerial Auditing Journal 17(4): 192 - 204
Anugerah, R., R. N. Sari, dan R. M. Frostiana. 2011. The Relationship between Ethics, Expertise, Audit Experience, Fraud Risk Assessment and Audit Situational Factors and Auditor Professional Skepticism. International Symposium on Finance and Accounting.
Asare, S. dan A. Wright. 1997. Hypothesis Revisions Strategies in Conducting Analytical Procedures. Accounting. Organizations and Society 22(8): 737-755.
Barnes, P. dan H. Huan. 2006. The auditor's going concern decision: Some UK evidence concerning independence and competence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 20: 213 - 228. 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00660.x.
Barrainkua, I. dan M. Pike. 2018. The influence of auditors’ professionalism on ethical judgement: Differences among practitioners and postgraduate students. Revista de Contabilidad 21(2): 176-187.
Beasley, M., J. Carcello, dan D. Hermanson. 2001. Top 10 Audit Deficiencies. Journal of Accountancy 191: 63-66.
Bramwell, J. 2019. At Least EY's 2017 PCAOB Inspection Report Is Not as Not Good as KPMG's. Retrieved January 6, 2020, from Goingconcern website: https:// goingconcern.com/at-least-eys-2017-pcaob-inspection-report-is-not-as-not-good-as-kpmgs/.
Carpenter, T., D. C. Durtschi dan L. M. Gaynor. 2011. The Incremental Benefits of a Forensic Accounting Course on Scepticism and Fraud-related Judg- ments. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(1): 1–21.
Carpenter, T. D. dan J. L. Reimers. 2013. Profesional Skepticism: The Effects of a Partner's Influence and the Level of Fraud Indicators on Auditors' Fraud Judgments and Actions. Behavioral Research in Accounting 25(2): 45-69.
Curtis, R. K. 2014. Breaking the Barrier - An Examination into the Current State of Profesional Skepticism. Honors Scholar Theses 340: 1-28.
Dessler, G. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT. Prenhallindo. Jakarta.
Enes, E. F., B. J. M. Almeida, A. M. F. G. da Silva, F. P. Carvalho, dan J. M. M. Simoes. 2016. Education as a contribution to reduce the audit expectation gap: The Portuguese case. Tékhne 14(1). 10-19.
Festinger, L. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Figueroa, C. B. R. dan R. Cardona. 2013. Does Experience Affect Auditors Professional Judgement? Evidence from Puerto Rico. Accounting and Taxation Journal 5(2): 13-32.
Fuad, K. 2015. Pengaruh independensi, kompetensi, dan prosedur audit ter- hadap tanggungjawab dalam pendeteksian fraud. Jurnal Dinamika Akun- tansi 7(1): 10-17.
Furiady, O. dan R. Kurnia. 2015. The Effect of Work Experiences, Competency, Motivation, Accountability and Objectivity towards Audit Quality. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (211), 25: 328-335.
Ghozali, I. 2018. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 25. Edisi 9. BP Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Gilbertson, D. dan T. Herron. 2014. Including audit regulation in the accounting curriculum. Research in Accounting Regu- lation 26(1): 118-131.
Glover, S. M. dan D. Prawitt. 2014. Enhancing Auditor Professional Skepticism: The Professional Skepticism Continum. Current Issues in Auditing (2): 1-10.
Gomes, F. C. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Edisi 2. Cetakan 4, Andi. Yogyakarta.
Hurtt, R. K. 2010. Development of a Scale to Measure Profesional Skepticism. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice dan Theory 29(1): 149-171. https://doi.org/ 10. 2308/aud.2010.29.1.149.
Hurtt, R. K., H. Brown-Liburd, C. E. Earley, dan G. Krishnamoorthy. 2013. Research on Auditor Profesional Skepticism: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice dan Theory 32(1): 45-97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361.
IAI. 2011. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP). Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
JuKang, Y., A. Trotman, dan K. Trotman. 2015. The effect of an Audit Judgment Rule on audit committee members’ professional skepticism: The case of accounting estimates. Accounting, Organization and Society 46: 59-76.
Kalau, A. A. 2013. Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, dan Skeptisisme Profesi- onal Auditor Internal Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Survey Persepsi Auditor Inspek- torat Kota Ambon). Cita Ekonomika. 7(2): 257-261.
Larimbi, D., B. Subroto, dan Rosidi. 2018. Pengaruh faktor-faktor personal ter- hadap skeptisisme profesional auditor. Jurnal Ekuitas 17(1): 89-107. http:// dx.doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2013.v17.i1.267.
Libby, R. dan D. Frederick. 1990. Experience and the Ability to Explain Audit Findings. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(2): 348-367.
Louwers, T., R. Ramsay, D. Sinason, dan J. Strawser. 2012. Auditing and Assurance Service. Mc Graw Hill. New York.
Nelson, M. W. 2009. A model and literature review of profesional skepticism in auditing. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice dan Theory 28(2): 1-34. https:// doi.org/10.2308/aud. 2009.28.2.1.
Oktarini, K. dan I. W. Ramantha. 2016. Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja Dan Kepatuhan Terhadap Kode Etik Pada Kualitas Audit Melalui Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 15(1): 754-783.
Olsen, C. dan A. Gold. 2018. Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism. Jour- nal of Accounting Literature 41: 127-141.
Payne, E. A. dan R. J. Ramsay. 2005. Fraud risk assessments and auditors' profesi- onal skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20 (3): 321-330. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/02686900510585636.
Popova, V. 2013. Exploration of skepticism, client-specific experiences, and audit judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2): 140-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/ 02686901311284540.
Rittenberg, L. E. 2012. Comments on Governance, Profesional Skepticism, and Auditor Independence. Retrieved January 4, 2020, from PCAOB website: http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket037/ps_Rittenberg.pdf
Rodgers, W., G. N. Mubako, dan L. Hall. 2017. Knowledge management: The effect of knowledge transfer on professional skepticism in audit engagement planning. Computers in Human Behavior. 70: 564-574.
Samsi, N. dan B. Riduwan. 2013. Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit: Etika Auditor sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi 1(2): 1-15.
Sanjaya, A. 2017. Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional, Independensi, Kompetensi, Pelatihan Auditor, dan Resiko Audit Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis 15(1): 41-55.
Sekaran, U. dan R. Bougie. 2016. Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th Edition). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. New Jersey.
Silalahi, S. P. 2013. Pengaruh Etika, Kompetensi, Pengalaman Audit dan Situasi Audit terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Ekonomi 21(3): 1-21.
Subhan. 2016. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi skeptisme profesional. AKTIVA Jurnal Akuntansi dan Investasi 1(2): 190-204.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Peneitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R dan D. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Winantyadi, N. dan I. Waluyo. 2014. Pengaruh Pengalaman, Keahlian, Situasi Audit, dan Etika terhadap Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor. Jurnal Nominal 3(1): 14-34.
Zahmatkesh, S. dan J. Rezazaadeh. 2017. The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne 15(2): 79-87.
Zarefar, A., Andreas, dan A. Zarefar. 2016. The Influence of Ethics, Experience and Competency toward the Quality of Auditing with Professional Auditor Scepticism as a Moderating Variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219: 828-832
