SOCIAL CAPITAL AND MULTI-STAKEHOLDERS COOPERATION AS A FOUNDATION OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2019.v3.i3.4158Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Multi-Stakeholders Cooperation, Program Pendampingan Posyandu, Sociap Capital.Abstract
The discussion of related Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the area of scholarship in Indonesia has been done in any progress. Refers to several studies that have been conducted, the results showed there are still many companies that run CSR programs does more than just as a powerful tool for development and improvement of the company image within the community. By taking the case on Program Pendampingan Posyandu Pelawi Menuju Posyandu Mandiri, leading to this study would be a different and more direct discussion on the explanation of the foundation that supports the sustainability of the program. This study uses qualitative methods with referring to a case study approach. Data obtained in this study is based on two stages, namely: in-depth interviews and field observations. The result shows that social capital and multi-stakeholders cooperation have been put to good use as a foundation of the sustainability program including its activities. However, the program is not free from criticism. Social capital used in the program tend to be exaggerated. When the use of excessive social capital persists, it will make Posyandu Pelawi dependency. Even though, as a preliminary, social support from various parties is very necessary for the Program. The goal efforts of achievement Program from stakeholders are still spontaneity and not specifically.
References
Allinson, R., K. Izsak, and E. Grinience. 2012. Catalysing Innovation in the Knowledge Triangle: Practices from the EIT Knowledge and Innovation Communities. Brussels: European Institute of Innovation and Technology - Technopols Group.
Bowen, J. R. 1986. On the Political Con- struction of Tradition: Gotong-royong in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Studies 45(3): 545–561.
Cohen, S. and L. Prusak. 2001. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organization Work. Harvard Business Press. London.
Coleman, J. 1999. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. Harvard Business Press. Cambridge.
Field, J. 2010. Social Capital. Routledge. London.
Freeman, E. R. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman Publi- shing. Boston.
Gupta, S. and D. Ogden. 2009. To Buy or not to Buy? A Social Dilemma Perspective on Green Buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing 26(6): 376–291.
Hair, J., H. Arthur, S. Phillip, and P. Mike. 2007. Research Methods for Business. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Cichester.
Hensen, E. and P. Ndhlovu. 2011. Conceptualising Corporate Social Respon- sibility (CSR) and Corporate Social Investment (CSI): The South African Context. Social Responsibility Journal 7(3): 332–346.
Jin, H. and J. Shriar. 2013. Linking Environmental Citizenship and Civic Engagement to Public Trust and Environmental Sacrifice in the Asian Context. Journal of Environmental Policy and Governance 23(4): 259–273.
Jones, B., R. Bowd, and R. Tench. 2009. Corporate Irresponsibility and Corpo- rate Social Responsibility: Competing Realities. Social Responsibility Journal.
Kania, J. and M. Kramer. 2013. Collective impact. Retrieved from Stanford Social Innovation Review website: https:// ssir.org/articles/entry/collective_impact.
Krisdyatmiko. 2012. Kemitraan Pemerintah-Swasta-Masyarakat dalam Bingkai Forum Multi-Stakeholders Corporate Social Responsibility (MSH-CSR). In Susetiawan (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Komitmen untuk Pember- dayaan Masyarakat (127–171). Azzagrafika. Yogyakarta.
Kusakabe, E. 2012. Social Capital Networks for Achieving Sustainable Development. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 17(10): 1043–1062.
Melo, T. and A. Garrido-Morgado. 2011. Corporate Reputation: A Combination of Social Responsibility and Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19(1): 11–31.
Moleong, L. J. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosda Karya. Bandung.
Mortensen, M. 2012. Through the looking glass: Reflected knowledge and trust in global collaboration (No. 2012/03/OB).
Putnam, R. D. 1993. Makin Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.
Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster. New York.
Ramasamy, B. and M. Yeung. 2010. The Determinants of Foreign Direct Invest- ment in Services. World Economy 33(4): 573-596.
Seavoy, R. E. 1977. Social Restraint on Food Production in Indonesian Subsistence Culture. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 8(1): 15–30.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan RandD. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Suharto, E. 2007. Pekerjaan Sosial di Dunia Industri: Memperkuat Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan. Refika Aditama. Bandung.
Suharto, E. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategy Management and Leadership. Inti Pesan. Jakarta.
Sumarto, M. 2017. Welfare Regime Change in Developing Countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Social Policy and Administration 51(6): 940–959.
Susetiawan. 2012. Implementasi CSR dalam Arena Civil Society: Antara Idealisme dan Realitas. In Susetiawan (Ed.), Corporate Social Responsibility: Komitmen untuk Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (pp. 3–30). Azzagrafika. Yogyakarta.
Tennyson, A. 1998. The Works of Alfred Lord Tennyson. Word-sworth Editions Ltd. Hertfordshire, UK.
Thoyre, A. 2011. Social capital as a facilitator of pro-environmental actions in the USA: A prelimenary examination of mechanisms. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability 16(1): 37–49.
Wibisono, Y. 2007. Membedah Konsep dan Aplikasi Corporate Social Responsibility (Fascho Pub). Gresik.
Woolcock, M. and D. Narayan. 2000. Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy. The World Bank Research Observer 15(2): 25–249.
Yuda, T. K. 2016. Memaknai Ulang Corporate Social Responsibility: Upaya Mewujudkan Fair Responsibility. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik 29(3): 200–217.
