DETERMINAN KECURANGAN AKUNTANSI DI LINGKUNGAN PERGURUAN TINGGI

Johan Arifin

Sari

Kecurangan bisa terjadi pada berbagai institusi, baik pada bisnis maupun publik sektor. Pada beberapa tahun terakhir ini, berbagai kasus seperti korupsi, penggelapan dana, dan mark-up anggaran telah ditemukan pada institusi pendidikan di Indonesia. Studi ini mengevaluasi apakah variabel-variabel potensial seperti moralitas individu, sistem pengendalian internal, dan informasi asimetri berpengaruh terhadap kecurangan akuntansi pada institusi pendidikan. Populasi penelitian ini adalah semua perguruan tinggi yang terdapat di wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakartta (DIY), sebuah kota yang mendapat julukan ‘kota pelajar’ yang menjadi tolok ukur kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Analisis regresi menunjukkan bahwa moralitas individu dan sistem pengendalian internal berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kecurangan akuntansi, sedangkan informasi asimetri tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kecurangan akuntansi. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan masukan kepada pengelola institusi pendidikan khususnya perguruan tinggi dalam memecahkan permasalahan kecurangan akuntansi, sehingga mereka dapat memberikan pelayanan terbaik kepada masyarakat.

Kata Kunci

Moralitas; Pengendalian Internal; Informasi Asimetri; Kecurangan Akuntansi

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Agrawal. A., and T. Cooper. 2015. Insider trading before accounting scandals. Journal of Corporate Finance. 34(1): 169-190.

Aranta, P. Z. 2013. Pengaruh moralitas aparat dan asimetri informasi terhadap kecurangan akuntansi (Studi pada Pemerintah Kota Sawahlunto). Jurnal Akuntansi 1 (1): 160.

Arjalies, D.L., and J. Mundy. 2013. The use of management control systems to manage CSR strategy: A levers of control perspective. Management Accounting Research. 24 (4): 284-300.

Artini, N.L.E.A., M.D. Adiputra., dan N. T. Herawati. 2014. Pengendalian internal terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi pada satuan kerja perangkat daerah. E-Journal Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 2 (1): 47-63.

Aryanto, M.S., T.H. Utaminingtyas., dan R. Anggraini. 2013. Pengaruh sistem pengendalian internal, sistem kompensasi, dan asimetri informasi dalam kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi. SNA XVI, 4770–4791.

Auriol, E., S. Straub, and T. Flochel. 2016. Public procurement and rent-seeking: The case of Paraguay. World Development. 77: 395-407.

Badara, M.S., and S.Z. Saidin. 2013. Impact of the effective internal control system on the internal audit effectiveness at local government level. Journal of Social and Development Sciences. 4 (1): 16-23.

Barr, A., and D.Serra. 2010. Corruption and culture: An experimental analysis. Journal of Public Economics. (94): 862-869.

Billett, M.T., J.A. Garfinkel, and M. Yu. 2017. The effect of asymmetric information on product market outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics. 123 (2): 357-376.

Breeden. D.T. and S. Viswanathan. 2016. Why do firms hedge? An asymetric information model. The Journal Fixed Income. 25 (3): 7-25.

Cram, W.A., M.K. Brohman, Y.E. Chan and R.B. Gallupe. 2016. Information systems control alignment: Complementary and conflicting systems development controls. Information and Management. 53 (2): 183-196.

Cressey, D. R. 1953. Other people’s money: A study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Michigan: Free Press.

Dellaportas, S. 2013. Confersation with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum. 37 (1): 29-39.

Dunk, A.S. (1993) The effects of job-related tension on managerial performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18 (7-8): 575-586.

Eliza, Y. 2015. Pengaruh moralitas individu dan pengendalian internal terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi. 4: 86–100.

Ghozali, I. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Diponegoro.

Huber, W.D. 2016. Forensic Accounting, Fraud Theory, and the End of the Fraud Triangle. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 12 (2): 28-48.

Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure theory of the firm : Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305–60. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X (diakses pada, 5 Juli 2018).

Johnson, W.C., W. Xie dan S. Yi. 2014. Corporate fraud and the value of reputations in the product market. Journal of Corporate Finance. 25 (1): 16-39.

Joseph, O.N., Albert, O., and Byaruhanga, J. 2015. Effect of internal control on fraud detection and prevention in district treasuries of Kakamega county. International Journal of Business and Management Invention. 4 (1): 47-57.

Jusup, A. H. 2010. Auditing. Yogyakarta: Penerbitan STIE YKPN.

Kabar Korupsi. 2014. Pengelolaan aset perguruan tinggi negeri rawan terjerat kasus korupsi. kabarkorupsi.com (diakses pada, 22 Juni 2018).

Kassem, R. and A.W. Higson. 2016. External auditor and corporate corruption: Implications for external audit regulators. Current Issues in Auditing. 10 (1): 1-10.

Kerler, W.A. and L.N. Killough. 2009. The effects of satisfaction with a client’s management during a prior audit engagement, trust, and moral reasoning on auditors’ perceived risk of management fraud. Journal of Business Ethics. 85 (2): 109-136.

Kohlberg. L.and R. Kramer. 1969. Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development. 12 (1): 93-120.

Kurniawan, G. 2013. Pengaruh moralitas, motivasi dan sistem pengendalian intern terhadap kecurangan laporan keuangan (Studi empiris pada SKPD di kota Solok). Artikel Universitas Negeri Padang.

Leonard, L.N.K., T.P. Cronan, and J. Kreie. 2004. What influences IT ethical behavior intentions-planned behavior, reasoned action, perceived importance, or individual characteristics?. Information and Management. 42 (1): 143-158.

Mardiasmo. 2016. Pewujudan transparansi dan akuntabilitas publik melalui akuntansi sektor publik: Suatu sarana good governance. Akuntansi Pemerintah 2. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Maulidi, A. 2016. Dealing with fraudulent financial statement in business organizations through whistleblowing system and staff awareness of fraud. International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS), 15-18 August 2016, Langkawi, Kedah, Malaysia.

Meindl. P., E. Jayawicreme, R.M. Furr, and W. Fleeson. 2015. A foundation beam for studying morality from a personological point of view: are individual differences in moral behaviors and thoughts consistent?. Journal of Research in Personality. 59: 81-92.

Najahningrum, A. F. 2013. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi fraud: Persepsi pegawai dinas provinsi DIY. Accounting Analysis Journal 2 (3): 259–267.

Ndofor, H.A., C. Wesley, and R.L. Priem. 2013. The effects of complexity-based information asymetries on financial reporting fraud. Journal of Management. 41 (6): 1774-1797.

Nordiawan, D. 2006. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Pepper, A. and J. Gore. 2015. Behavioral Agency Theory: New Foundations for Theorizing About Executive Compensation. Journal of Management. 41 (4): 1045-1068.

Pierre, M.S., G. Hofinger and R. Simon. 2016. Strategies for Action: Ways to Achieve Good Decisions. Crisis Management in Acute Care Settings. 2 (1): 209-229.

Prawira, M. D., N. T. Herawati., & N. A. S. Darmawan. 2014. Pengaruh moralitas individu, asimetri informasi dan efektivitas pengendalian internal terhadap kecenderungan kecurangan (fraud) akuntansi (Studi empiris pada Badan Usaha Milik Daerah kabupaten Buleleng). E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 2 (1).

Puspasari, N., & E. Suwardi. 2012. Pengaruh moralitas individu dan pengendalian internal terhadap kecendrungan kecurangan akuntansi: Studi eksperimen pada konteks pemerintah daerah. Jurnal SNA XV, 1–30.

Rahim. H.Y.A. and D.E. Stevens. 2018. Information system precision and honesty in managerial reporting: A re-examination of information asymmetry effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 64 (1): 31-43.

Ratnayani, P., A. E. Sujana. & N. A. S. Darmawan. 2014. Pengaruh pengendalian intern kas dan implememtasi good governance terhadap fraud (Studi empiris pada SKPD di Kabupaten Buleleng). E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha 2 (1).

Roberts, M.R. 2015. The role of dynamic renegotiation and asymmetric information in financial contracting. Journal of Financial Economics, 116 (1): 61-81.

Sargiacomo, M., L. Lanni., A. D'Andreamattio and S. Servalli. 2015. Accounting and the fight against corruption in Italian government procurement: A longitudinal critical analysis (1992–2014). Critical Perspectives on Accounting. 28: 89-96.

Sudarshan. P. 2014. Of Mode of reasoning and context: Danish evidence of accounting student's moral reasoning abilities in resolving ethical dilemmas related to fraud. Research Repository University of Essex. http://repository.essex.ac.uk/9860/. Diakses: 21 Desember 2018.

Temaluru, N.A.R., Asnawi., and Falah. 2016. Pengaruh penerapan unit layanan pengadaan (ULP) terhadap efisiensi dan efektifitas pengadaan barang/jasa pada pemerintah propinsi Papua. Jurnal Keuda. 1 (1): 127-151.

Thoyibatun, S. 2012. Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap perilaku tidak etis dan kecenderungan akuntansi serta akibatnya terhadap kinerja organisasi. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan 16 (2): 245–260.

Ugrin, J.C., M.D. Odom and R.L.Ott. 2014. Examining the effects of motive and potential detection on the anticipation of consequences for financial statement fraud. Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting. 6 (1): 151-180.

Vries, H.D., Bekkers, V., and Tummers. 2015. Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration. 94 (1): 146-166.

Wu, S.P.J., D.W. Straub., and T.P. Liang. 2015. How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers. Management Information Systems Quartely. 39 (2): 497-518.

Zhang, Q. and H. Zhao. 2017. An Analytical Overview of Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development in College Moral Education in Mainland China. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 5: 151-160.

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.