PENGARUH DESENTRALISASI DAN KOMITMEN ORGANISASIONAL TERHADAP HUBUNGAN ANTARA PENGANGGARAN PARTISIPATIF DAN KINERJA MANAJERIAL

Ikhsan Budi Rihardjo

doi:10.24034/j25485024.y2009.v13.i3.387

Authors

Ikhsan Budi Rihardjo Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2009.v13.i3.387

Keywords:

Participative budgeting, managerial performance, decentralization, organizational commitment, moderating factor, contingency factor

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to test empirically and analyze whether or not there is relationship between participative budgeting and managerial performance, as well as to test empirically and analyze whether decentralization and organizational commitment as moderating variables influence the relationship between participative budgeting and managerial performance in local government. The samples of this research are taken from local government organization population, that is the partner of local apparatus working unit (Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah/SKPD) until two level under SKPD manager. From 420 shared questionnaires, there are founded 147 respondents whos return their answers, and only 98 questionnaires, which fulfill the requirement to be computed and involved in final analysis.Hypotheses testing technique that is used to test the relationship between participative budgeting and managerial performance is simple regression. And to test influential interaction of two contingency factor (decentralization and organizational commitment), Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) is used. The empirical result using simple regression show that participative budgeting influences the managerial performance in local government organization. While empirical result using moderated regression analysis shows that the Interaction between participative budgeting and decentralization structure affects managerial performance significantly. Interaction between participative budgeting and organizational commitment does not affect managerial performance of local government organization significantly.

References

Anthony dan Govindarajan. 2004. Management Control System, 11th Edition, McGraw Hill.

Brownell. 1981. Participation in Budgeting, Locus of Control and Organization Effectiveness, The Accounting Review, pp. 844-860.

Brownell. 1982. A Field Study Examination of Budgetary Participation and Locus of Control, The Accounting Review, pp. 766-777.

Brownell dan McInnes. 1986. Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol. LXI, No. 4, pp. 587-600.

Budi Ikhsan. 2002. Pengaruh Struktur Organisasional dan Locus of Control Terhadap Hubungan Antara Penganggaran Partisipatif Dengan Kinerja manajerial dan Kepuasan Kerja pada Organisasi Sektor Publik, EKUITAS, Vol. 6 No. 2.

Chenhall. 1986. Authoritarianism and Participative Budgeting: A Dyadic Analysis, The Accounting Review, Vol. LXI, No. 2, pp. 263-272.

Frucot dan Shearon. 1991. Budgetary Participation, Locus of Control, and Mexican Managerial Performance and Job Satisfaction, The Accounting Review, pp. 80-89.

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS, Cetakan IV, Badan Penerbit – UNDIP, Semarang.

Gul et al., 1995. Decentralization as a Moderating Factor in the Budgetary Participation-Performance Relationship: Some Hong Kong Evidence, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 25, No. 98, pp. 107-113.

Hartmann dan Moers. 1999. Testing Contingency Hypotheses in Budgetary Research: A Evaluation of the Use of Moderated Regression Analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24, pp. 291-315.

Henley et al., 1992. Public Sector Accounting and Financial Control, Fourth Edition, Chapman & Hall.

Indriantoro. 1993. The Effect of Participative Budgeting on Job performance and Job Satisfaction with Locus of Control and Cultural Dimension as Moderating Variable, University of Kentucky, Dissertation, Publication No. 18.

Jones dan Pendlebury. 2000. Public Sector Accounting, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall.

Merchant. 1981. The Design of the Corporate Budgeting System: Influences on Managerial Behavior and Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol. LVI, No. 4, pp. 813-828.

Nauri dan Parker.1998. The Relationship Between Budget Participation and Job Performance: The Roles of Budget Adequacy and Organizational Comimitment, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23, No. 5/6, pp. 467-483.

Nazaruddin. 1998. Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial, Tesis S2, UGM.

Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 17 Tahun 2003 Tentang Keuangan Negara.

_______________. 2004. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perbendaharaan Negara.

_______________. 2004. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 15 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara.

_______________. 2004. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

_______________. 2004. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 33 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah.

_______________. 2004. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No. 25 Tahun 2004 Tentang Sistem Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional.

_______________. 2005. Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 58 Tahun 2005 Tentang Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.

_______________. 2006. Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah.

Riyadi. 1998. Motivasi dan Pelimpahan Wewenang Sebagai Variabel Moderating dalam Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran dan Kinerja Manajerial, Tesis S2, UGM.

Sardjito dan Muthaher. 2007. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Aparat Pemerintah Daerah: Budaya Organisasi dan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Moderating, Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X ASPP-07.

Syakhroza. 2000. Anggaran Sebagai Kegiatan Ceremonial dan Simbol Prestisius bagi Manajemen: Sebuah Tinjauan Literatur, Usahawan No. 11 Th. XXIX.

Syafri. 1996. Manajemen Kontemporer, Cetakan Pertama, Grafindo Persada Jakarta

Wagner. 1994. Participation’s Effects on Performance and Satisfaction: a Reconsideration of Research Evidence, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, 312-330.