PERILAKU OPORTUNISTIK PEJABAT EKSEKUTIF DALAM PENYUSUNAN APBD

Ikhsan Budi Riharjo, Isnadi Isnadi

Sari

Budgeting bring important issues that affect the behavior that had an impact on the effectiveness of government organizations. Government financial management that are not in accordance with the rules is the opportunistic behavior of executive officers so that the push to make mistakes in determining budget allocations in the preparation of Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Daerah (APBD). Purpose of this research is focused on opportunistic behavior of executives who push the influence of direct personnel expenditure, goods and services expenditure and capital expenditure against budget slack prosperity for the people that come from natural resource revenue in accordance with article 33 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia tahun 1945. This research is quantitative research using multiple linear regression analysis as well as moderating variables to obtain empirical evidence of research, the data used in the form of secondary data of Region Expense and Revenue Budget all  government  region in Indonesia in 2009, whereas samples in accordance with the requirements of the sampling method amounted to 31 government provence/regency/municipal. Results showed that the opportunistic behavior of the executive officials encourage an increase in personnel expenditure budget directly, goods-services-capital expenditure, which resulted in budget slack for the prosperity of the people that come from natural resource revenues.

Kata Kunci

Opportunistic Behavior; Budget Slack; Prosperity of The People

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Abdullah, Sukriy dan Asmara Jhon Andra. 2006. Perilaku Oportunistik Legislatif Dalam Penggaran Daerah: Bukti Empiris atas Aplikasi Agency Theory di sektor Publik, Makalah disajikan pada Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 9 Padang 23-26 Agustus 2006

Anthony, Robert N. and Vijay Govindarajan. (1998). Management Control System. Edisi 9, Mc-Graw-Hill.

Andvig, Jens Chr., Odd-Helge Fjeldstad, Inge Amundsen, Tone Sissener dan Tina Soreide. 2001. Corruption: A review of contemporary research. Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights Report R 2001: 7. Web: http//www.cmi.no.

Asyik, Nur Fadjrih. 2007. Pola-Pola Perilaku Eksekutif Berkaitan Dengan Tahapan Penawaran Opsi Saham: Uji Komprehensif di Sekitar tanggal Hibah. Makalah disajikan pada Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X , di Unhas Makasar 26-28 Juli 2007

Bergman, Lane. 1990. Management and public organization: The principal-agent framework. University of Geneva and National University of Singapore.

Carr, Jered B. dan Ralph S. Brower. 2000. Principled opportunism: Evidence from the organizational middle. Public Administration Quarterly (Spring): 109-138.

Djajasinga, Marselina. 2007. Riset Anggaran Untuk Rakyat Studi Kasus: APBD Kota Bandar Lampung Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan , Volume XII No. 1.

Fozzard, Adr Freeman, Robert J. dan Craig D. Shoulders. 2003. Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting-Theory and Practice. Seventh edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Garamfalvi, L. 1997. Corruption in the public expenditures management process. Paperpresented at 8th International Anti-Corruption Conference, Lima, Peru, 7-11September. http://www.transparencv.org/iacc/8th iacc/papers/garamfalvi/ garamfalvi.html.

Groehendijk, Nico. 1997. A principal-agent model of corruption. Crime, Law dan Social Change 27: 207-229.

Hamzah, Ardi. 2007. Analisis Good Governance dan Value For Money Dalam Perencanaan dan Penganggaran Daerah : Sebuah Studi Interpretif ( Studi Pada Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil di Kota Majokerto dan Kabupaten Sidoarjo)

Hagen, Terje P., Rune J. Sorensen, dan Oyvind Norly. 1996. Bargaining strength in budgetary process: The impact of institutional procedures. Journal of Theoretical Politics 8(1): 41-63.

Hagen Von, Jurgen. 2002. Fiscal rules, fiscal institutions, and fiscal performance. The Economic and Social review 33(3): 263-284.

Halim, Abdul dan Syukriy Abdullah. 2006. Hubungan dan masalah keagenan di pemerintahan daerah: sebuah peluang penelitian anggaran dan akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah 2(1): 53-64.

Hardjowijono, Budihardjo. 2006. Kebocoran Proyek Pengadaan Mencapai 50 % http://els.bappenas.go.id.

Hasniati Cut. 2010. Ketika Kemiskinan Menjadi Tontonan dan Proyek http://www.acehinstitute.org

Johnson, Cathy Marie. 1994. The Dynamics of Conflict between Bureaucrats andLegislators. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Juoro, Umar. 2009. Respon Opini Disclaimer Pada Laporan BPK Terhadap Audit LKPP. Jakarta. SUARA KARYA ONLINE.

Kasper, Wolfang dan Manfred E. Streit. 2001. Institutional Economics: Social Order and Public Policy. Cheltham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Krueger, A. 1974. The Political Economy of the rent-seeking Society, American Economic Review 64 (3). 291-303

Lane, van-Erik. 2003. Management and public organization: The principal-agent framework. University of Geneva and National University of Singapore. Working paper.

Lupia, Arthur dan Mathew McCubbins. 2000. Representation or abdication? How citizens use institutions to help delegation succeed. European Journal of Political Research 37: 291-307.

Magner, Nace dan Gary G. Johnson. 1995. Municipal officials' reactions to justice in budgetary resource allocation. Public Administration Quarterly (Winter): 439-456.

Mauro, Paolo. 1998. Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. Journal of Public Economics 69: 263-279.

Moe, T. M. 1984. The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science 28(5): 739-777.

Raharjo, M Dawam . 1987. Perekonomian Indonesia, Jakarta: Erlangga

Republik Indonesia. 2009. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester II tahun 2009. Situs Resmi BPK RI

Republik Indonesia. 1999. Undang Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945 dan Amandemennya

Republik Indonesia. 2006. Permendagri No 13 tahun 2006 tentang Pedoman Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah

Republik Indonesia. 2003. Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia No 80 tahun 2003 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah

Republik Indonesia. 2009. data APBN 2009 dan APBD 2009 Situs Kementerian Keuangan, Jakarta

Republik Indonesia. 2003. Undang-Undang No 17 tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara

Siegel.G. dan H.R. Marconi Boulian. 1989. Behavioural Accauntung. Cincinati Ohio. South-Western. Publishing.Co

Strom, K. 2000. Delegation and accountability in parlementary democraties Europion Journal of Political Research 37: 261-289.

Supeno, Hadi. 2009. Korupsi Kepala Daerah, APBD Sasaran Penyelewengan, Jakarta, http//www berita baru.com

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.