DETERMINANT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY: CASE FROM INDONESIA

Authors

  • Yusuf Sulfarano Barusman Universitas Bandar Lampung Universitas Lampung
  • Lindrianasari Lindrianasari Universitas Bandar Lampung Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2016.v20.i1.38

Keywords:

pengungkapan pertanggungjawaban sosial, pemerintah share, spesifikasi perusahaan, ukuran perusahaan, umur perusahaan

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memberikan bukti empiris pada faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi tingkat indeks pengungkapan pertanggungjawaban sosial perusahaan. Indeks pengungkapan pertanggungjawaban sosial perusahaan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan indeks GRI G3.1, yang terdiri dari enam poin utama, yaitu pengaruh ekonomi langsung, hal-hal yang berkaitan dengan lingkungan, praktik ketenagakerjaan, hak asasi manusia, sosial, dan tanggung jawab untuk produk. Data penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder, yang diperoleh dari laporan tahunan perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 20 perusahaan yang dipilih menggunakan penyempelan acak. Pengamatan yang dilakukan selama periode 2007-2014. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kepemilikan (saham) pemerintah, spesifikasi perusahaan, dan ukuran perusahaan menjadi penentuan terbaik untuk indeks CSR. Selain itu, teori regulasi yang memprediksi bahwa keterlibatan pemerintah dapat mendorong lebih banyak perusahaan mematuhi aturan yang berlaku, berhasil dikonfirmasi dalam penelitian ini.

References

Aaronson, S. 2003. CSR in the Global Village: the British Role Model and the American Laggard. Business and Society Review 108(3): 309–338. Agle, B. R., T. Donaldson, R.E. Freeman, M. Jensen, R.K. Mitchell, and D.J. Wood. 2010. Dialogue: Toward Superior Stake- holder Theory. Business Ethics Quarterly 18(2): 153-190. Ali, I. M., E. Esa, and A. R. Zahari. 2012. Sustainable Development Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Share holder Value: A Study of Government Linked Companies. Paper Series. Asmaranti, Y. and Lindrianasari. 2014. Comparation of Greenhouse Gas Emission Disclosure Before and After Enactment of the Indonesia Act No. 17 of 2004. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting 8(4): 225-234. Babiak, K. and S. Trendafilova. 2011. CSR and Environmental Responsibility: Motives and Pressures to Adopt Green Management Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18: 11–24. Barkemeyer, R. 2007. Legitimacy as a Key Driver and Determinant of CSR in Developing Countries. Paper for the 2007 Marie Curie Summer School on Earth System Governance, 28 May – 06 June, Amsterdam. Battaglia, M., L. Bianchi, M. Frey, and F. Iraldo. 2010. An Innovative Model to Promote CSR among SMEs Operating in Industrial Clusters: Evidence froman EU Project.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 17: 133–141. Blombäck, A. and C. L. Wigren. 2009. Challenging the importance of size as determinant for CSR activities. Manage- ment of Environmental Quality 20(3): 255-270.Branco, M. C. and L. L. Rodrigues. 2006. Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks. A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 11(3): 232-248.

Brown, J. and M. Fraser. 2006. Approaches and Perspectives in Social and Environ- mental Accounting: an Overview of the Conceptual Landscape. Business Stra- tegy and the Environment 15: 103–117.

Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional concepttual model of corporate perfor- mance. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 497-505.

Chamorro, A. and T. M. Bañegil. 2005. Green Marketing Philosophy: A Study of SpanishFirms with Ecolabels. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environ- mental Management 13(1): 11-24.

Claessens, S., S. Djankov. and L. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Ownership and Con- trol in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58(1–2): 81–112. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 92-117. Crowther, D. and G. Aras. 2008. Corporate Social responsibility. Ventus Publishing ApS. Denmark, Frederiksberg. Dashwood, H. S. 2007. Canadian Mining Companies and Corporate Social Responsibility: Weighing the Impact of Global Norms. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique 40(1): 129-156. Davis, K. 1973. The Case For and Against Business Assumption of Social Responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal 16(2): 312-22.Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Godfrey, P. C. and, N. W. Hatch. 2007. Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics 70: 87–98.

Gray, Rob. 2002. The Social Accounting Project And Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings And Pragmatism Over Critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27: 687–708. Hamann, Ralph and P. Kapelus. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility in Mi- ning in Southern Africa: Fair Accountability or just greenwash? Development 47(3): 85–92.

Hiscox, M. J. and N. F. B. Smyth. 2007. Is There Consumer Demand for Improved Labor Standards? Evidence from Field Experiments in Social Product Labeling. Unpublish paper. Husted, B. W. and D. B. Allen. 2011. Corporate Social Strategy Stakeholder Engagement and Competitive Advantage. Cambridge University Press. New York. Jamali, D. and R. Mirshak. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Theory and Practice in a Developing Country Con- text. Journal of Business Ethics 72: 243-262. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360. Kapelus, P. 2002. Mining, Corporate Social Responsibility and the "Community": The Case of Rio Tinto, Richards Bay Minerals and the Mbonambi. Journal of Business Ethics 39(3): 275-296. KPMG. 2011. International Survey of Corpo- rate Responsibility Reporting 2011. https://www.kpmg.com/PT/pt/IssuesAndInsights/Documents/corporate-responsibility2011.pdf. Downloaded at 10th of Sept.2016.

Li, W., and R. Zhang. 2010. Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure,

Dina, F., Lindrianasari, and Y. Asmaranti. 2016. Environmental Management Activity toward Financial Performance in Indonesian Mining Companies Inter- national Journal of Environment and Sustainability 5(1): 76-85.and Political Interperence: Evidence from China. Journal of Businee Ethics 96: 631-645.

Lindrianasari, 2007. Hubungan Antara Kinerja Lingkungan dan Kualitas Pengungkapan Lingkungan Dengan Kinerja Ekonomi Perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia 11(2): 159-172. Lindrianasari and Y. Asmaranti. 2016. Investigative Studies On Environmental Disclosure And The Costs of R & D As A Compliance With Government Policy On Corporate Social Responsibility in Indonesia. International Journal of Environment and Sustainability 5(2): 61-71. McWilliams, A. and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. The Academy of Management Review 26(1): 117-127. McWilliams, A., D. S. Siegel, and P. M. Wright. 2005. Corporate Social Respon- sibility: Strategic Implications. Un-Publish Paper. Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics: http://www.rpi.edu/ dept/economics/www/workingpaper. Meehan, J., K. Meehan, and A. Richards. 2006. Corporate social responsibility: the 3C-SR model. International Journal of Social Economics 33(5/6): 386-398. Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review 22(4): 853-886. Moon, J. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility: On Overview. International Directory of Corporate Philanthropy Europa Publi- cations, London. Moon, J. 2004. Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility: The UK in Comparative Perspective. Research Paper Series International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. Editor: Dirk Matten. ISSN 1479-5124.

Nan, X., and K. Heo. 2007. Consumer Responses to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Initiatives. Examining the Role of Brand-Cause Fit in Cause-Related. Marketing Journal of Advertising 36(2): 63–74.

Ndemanga, D. A. and E. T. Koffi. 2009. Ownership Structure, Industry sector and Corporate SocialResponsibility (CSR) Practices: The case of Swedish listed companies. Master Degree Project. University of Gothenburg School of Business, Economics and Law. Germa- ny.

O’Dwyer B. 2003. Conceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility: the Nature of Managerial capture. Accounting, Audi- ting and Accountability Journal 16(4): 523–557.

Parmar, B. L., R. E. Freeman, J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, S. DeColle, and L. Purnell. 2010. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Preston, L. E. and J. E. Post. 1975. Measuring corporate responsibility. Journal of General Management 2(3): 45-53.

Sen, S. and C. B. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corpo- rate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research 38(2): 225-243.

Tsoutsoura, M. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Working Paper Series Center for Responsible Business. Permalink: http:// escholarship.org/ uc/item/111799p2

World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2003. Sustainable Development Reporting: Striking the Balance. WBCSD: Geneva. Wright, P. and S. P. Ferris. 1997. Agency Conflict and Corporate Strategy: The Effect of Divestment on Corporate Value. Strategic Management Journal 18(1): 77-83. Yakovieva, N. and D. V. Brust. 2012. Stake- holder perspective on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina. Journal Business Ethics 106: 191-211.

Published

2018-09-05

Issue

Section

Artikel