KONSTRUKSI KEBIJAKAN ANGGARAN: AKSENTUASI DRAMA POLITIK DAN KEKUASAAN (STUDI KASUS KABUPATEN JEMBRANA BALI)

Authors

  • Syarifuddin Syarifuddin Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2011.v15.i3.371

Keywords:

governmental accounting, budgeting, politic, power, dramaturgy, qualitative

Abstract

The aims of this study, is to analyse how the political interaction, power and politics occurred in budget policy constructionSpecifically, the study aims at answering who become the actor behind budget policy, how they think, how they interact to dramatize the policy construct. Method of study employs extended dramaturgy reflecting the development of dramaturgy method proposed by Erving GoffmanThis method assumes that during interaction, people not only realize others, but also recognize themselves. Therefore, people not only interact with others, but they interact with themselves symbolically. This interaction is observed in Jembrana local government and society as a unit of analysis.The results of this study are: (1) the accounting man uses politic and power to identify social problem as the base to determine budget policy, (2) In analyzing the identification of education problem as social problem,  power must be demanded to reveal the fact because the problem cannot speak about itself,  (3)  the problem identified should be adjusted to the issue beyond the individual local environment and individual life coverage, and (4) the most prominent text with budget policy “constructive” view at Jembrana municipality corresponds with view on “justice” and “truth” along with “ngaya” symbolizing of “the freedom”. Ngaya pertains to analtruistic” politic, meaning to serve the community and the government, to get better post-reincarnation life.

References

Almond, G.A. 1991. Rational Choice Theory and The Social Science, dalam K.R.Monroe (Ed.). The Economic Approach to Politics. Harper Collins, New York.

Anderson, J. 1969. Public Policy Making. Second edition: Holt, Renehart and Winston, New York.

Bachrach, P.S., dan M.S. Baratz. 1963. Decisions and Non Decisions: An Analytical Framework. American Political Science Review. 57: 41-51.

Becker, S.W., dan D.O. Green. 1962. Budgeting and Employee Behavior. Journal of Business. Oktober: 392-402.

Berger, P.L., dan T. Luckmann. 1975. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on The Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx.

Boland, R.J., dan L.R. Pondy. 1983. Accounting in organizations: A union of natural and rational perspectives. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 8: 223-234.

Broadbent, J., dan R.C. Laughlin. 1997. Developing empirical research: an example informed by a Habermasian approach. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 10(5): 622-648.

Burchell, S., C. Clubb, , A.G. Hopwood, J. Hughes, dan J.C. Nahapiet. 1980. The Roles of Accounting in Organizations and Society. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 5(1): 5-27.

Callahan, K. 2002. The Utilization and Effectiveness of Citizen Advisory Committees in the Budget Proceess of Local Governments. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management. 14(2): 295-319.

Chua, W. F. 1986. Radical developments in accounting thought. The Accounting Review. LXI(4): 601-631.

Chua, W.F. 1988. Interpretive Sociology and Management Accounting Research: A critical review. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal. 1(2): 59-79.

Cobb, R.W., dan C.D. Elder. 1983. The Political Uses of Symbols. Longman. New York.

Coleman, J.S., dan T.J. Fararo. 1992. Rational Choice Theory: Advocacy and Critique. Sage Publication. Newbury Park.

Crenson, M.A. 1971. The Unpolitics of Air Pollution: A Study of Non-Decision Making in the Cities. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

Dahl, R. 1955. Hierarchy, democracy and bargaining in politics and economics, in Dahl, R., 1985. A Preface to an Economic Theory of Democracy. Polity Press, London.

Dowding, K. 1991. Rational Choice and Political Power. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.

Dowding, K. 1994. The Compatibility of Behaviouralism, Rational Choice and New Institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics. 6(1): 105-117.

Dunleavy, P. 1991. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.

Ebdon, C. 2002. Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in The Local Government Budgeting Process. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management. 14(2): 273-294.

Flood, R.L., dan M.C. Jackson. 1991. Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Wiley. Chichester.

Foucault, M. 1980. Discipline and Punishment. Vintage. New York.

Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Goodin, R. E. 1976. The Politics of rational Man. Wiley and Son. New York.

Greer, S., dan C. Patel. 2004. Accounting and Culture: The Issue of a Unique Australian Indigenous World View. Critical Perspective on Accounting.

Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press.

Hassall, J., dan L. Worrall. 1997. Developing a fuzzy approach to the measurement of organisational effectiveness: a local government perspective. Second International Conference on the Dynamics of Strategy. SEMS. University of Surrey: 200-13.

Hedo, H. 1974. Social Policy in Britain and Sweden. Yale University Press. New Haven. Conn.

Hofstede, G. 1981. Management control of public and not-for-profit activities. Accounting Organizations and Society. 6(3).

Hopper, T., dan A. Powell. 1985. Making Sense of Research in The Organisational and Social Aspects of Management Accounting: A Review of Underlying Assumptions. Journal of Management Studies. 22(3): 429-465.

Hopwood, A.G., dan P. Miller. 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Irianto, Gugus. 2004. A Critical Enquiry Into Privatization of State-Owned Enterprises: The Case of PT. Semen Gresik (Persero) Tbk. Indonesia. unpublished PhD. Thesis. University of Wollongong, Australia.

Kaplan, Abraham. 1950. Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry. CT: Yale University Press. New Haven.

King, D.S. 1987. The New Right: Politics, Markets, and Citizenship. Macmillan, Basingstoke.

King, R.F. 2000. Budgeting Entitlements: The politics of food stamps. Georgetown University Press. Washington DC.

Koven, S.G. 1999. Public budgeting in the United States: The Cultural and Ideological Settings. Georgetown University Press, Washington DC.

Lane, J.E. 1993. The Public Sector: Concepts, Models and Approaches. Sage Publications. London.

Laughlin, R.C. 1988. Accounting in its social context: an analysis of accounting systems of the Church of England’’. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1(20): 19-42.

Lowi, T.J. 1972. Four Systems of Policy Politics and Choice. Public Administration Review. 32: 298-310.

Miller, P. 1994. Accounting as social practice, in A.G. Hopwood, dan P. Miller, 1994, Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Morgan, B. 1986. Images of Organization. Sage, California.

Parsons, W. 1997. Public Policy: An introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. UK.

Pilliang, Y.A.. 2005. Transpolitika: Dinamika Politik di dalam Era Virtualitas. Jalasutra, Yogyakarta.

Preston, A. 1986. Interactions and Arrangements in the Process of Informing. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 11(6): 521-540.

Rittel, dan Webber. 1973. Wicked problems. Policy Sciences. 5(1): 77-87.

Ryan, R.J., R.W. Scapens, dan M. Theobald. 2002. Research Methods and Methodology in Accounting and Finance. 2nd Edition. Thomson. London.

Scapens, R.W. 1991. Management Accounting: a review of recent developments. 2nd Edition. MacMillan. London.

Scapens, R.W., dan J. Arnold. 1986. Economics and Management Accounting Research, in M. Bromwich and A. Hopwood, 1986. Research and Current Issues in Management Accounting. Pitman: 78-102, London.

Schneider, J.W. 1985. Social problems: the constructionist view. Annual Review of Sociology. 11: 209-229.

Siegel, G., dan H. M. Marconi. 1989. Behavioral Accounting. South Western Publishing Co., Ohio.

Sukoharsono, E.G. 1995. A Power and Knowledge Analysis of Indonesian Accounting History: Social, Political, and Economic Forces Shaping The Emergence and Development of Accounting. unpublished PhD. Thesis.University of Wollongong. Australia.

Tinker, A.M. 1980. Towards a political economy of accounting: an illustration of the Cambridge controversies. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 5(5): 147-160.

Tinker, A.M. 1985. Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting. Holt Rinehart and Winston, London.

Tomkins, C., dan R. Groves. 1983. The everyday accountant and researching his reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 8(4): 361-374.

Triyuwono, Iwan. 1995. Shari’ate Organization and Accounting: The Reflections of Self Faith and Knowledge. unpublished PhD. Thesis. University of Wollongong, Australia.

Von Hagen, J. 1998. Budgeting Institutions for Aggregate Fiscal Discipline. Center for European Integration Studies.

Von Hagen, J. 2002. Fiscal rules, fiscal institution and fiscal performance. The Economic and Social Review. 33(3): 263-284.

Ward, H. 1995. Rational Choice Theory, dalam D.Marsh dan G.Stoker (Eds.). Theory and Methods in Political Science. Macmillan, Basingstoke.

Weber, M 1991. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. ed., Routledge. London.

Whittington, R., dan Stacey, R. 1994. Strategic management and organisational dynamics. Journal of Management Studies. 31(3): 453-55.

Wildavsky, A. 2004. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. Fifth Edition, Pearson Education Inc., United States.

Worall, L., C. Collinge dan T. Bill. 1998. Managing Strategies in Local Government. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 11(6): 472-493.

Published

2018-09-25

Issue

Section

Artikel