PENGARUH PENGORBANAN DAN KUALITAS LAYANAN TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN ULANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2005.v9.i4.310Keywords:
Sacrifice, Quality, Satisfaction, and Structural Equation ModellingAbstract
This study investigates The Conceptual Model of Decision Making of Repeat Buying motorbike Honda in 20 (twenty) dealer Sale of Honda in Surabaya. This research expected can assist heads of dealer in taking decision related to Sacrifice and Quality Service with Value Service and Consumer Satisfaction, and its influence to Decision of Repeat Buying motorbike honda. According to sacrifice released by consumer to get service and product become big especial size measure the so small service value. Company (dealer) in submitting service and provide the quality of service represent all important matter in creating value to customer and his innings will be able to determine service value. Synergity among service value and satisfaction of consumer give contribution to decision of consumer in repeat buying motorbike Honda in Surabaya.
Sampel in this research are repeat buyers and user of motorbike honda in region of Surabaya as responder counted 106 people. Analysis technique in this research used Structural Equation Modelling [SEM] one step & two step approach with program AMOS 4,0. Result of examination find that inexistence of multikolinierity in sacrifice, quality of service, service value, and satisfaction of consumer and also decision of repeat buying.
Service value not yet earned to give influence of signifikan to sacrifice. Service value can give influence of signifikan to quality of service. While satisfaction of consumer not yet earned to give influence of signifikan to service value, but signifikan to quality of service. Decision of repeat buying can give influence of signifikan to quality of service, but not signifikan to consumer satisfaction
References
Anderson, James C. & David W. Gerbing. 1988. Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin Vol. 103. No. 3: 411-423.
Beckett, A.; Hewer, P. and Howcroft B. 2000. An Exposition of Consumer Behavior in The Financial Services Industry. International Journal of Bank Marketing 18/1: 15-26.
Cronin, J.J; Michael K. Brady dan Thomas Hult. 2000. Assesing the Effectts of Quality, Value and Customer Satisfaction on Cunsumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal Of Retailing Vol.76: 193-218.
Cronin, J. Joseph dan Steven A.Taylor. 1992. Measuring Service Quality Reexamination and Extension. Journal of Marketing Vol.56: 55-68.
Dabholkar, P. A. dan C. David Sheperd. 1996. A Comphrehensive Framework For Service Quality: an Investigation of Critical Conceptual and Measurement Issues Through a Longitudinal Study. Journal of Retailing Vol.76. No.2: 139-173.
DeVellis, Robert F. 1991. Scale Development. Sage Publication. California.
Fomell, Claes. 1996. A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing Vol.56 (Januari): 6-21.
Groth, John C. and Richard T.Dye. 1999. Service Quality, Perceived Value, Expectation, Shortfalls and Bonuses. Managing Service Quality Vol.9. No.4: 274-285.
Kotler, Philip. 2000. Marketing Management The Millennium Edition. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Reichheld, F.F dan Sasser, W.E.Jr. 1990. Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Service. Harvard Business Review Vol.68. September-Oktober: 105-111.
Shemwell, D.J.; Ugur Yawas dan Zeynep Bilgin. 1998. Customer Service Provider Relationships an Empirical Test of Model of Service Quality, Satisfaction an Relationship-Oriented Outcomes. International of Service Industry Management Vol.9. No.2: 155-168.
Sutisna. 2001. PeriIaku Konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran Jasa. Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Teas, R.K dan Sanjeeev Agawal. 2000. The Effect of Extrinsic Products Cues on Consumers’ Perceptions of Quality, Sacrifice an Value. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science Vol.28: 278-290.
Tjiptono, Fandy. 1997. Strategi Pemasaran. Andi offset. Yogyakarta.
Zeithaml, A. Valarie. 1998. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality an Value: A Means, End Model Model Syasthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing Vol. 52 (July): 2-22.
