ANALISIS JALUR DALAM FUNGSI PELAYANAN TERHADAP LOYALITAS NASABAH DENGAN PURNA-PELAYANAN SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING: STUDI KASUS DI BPR PONOROGO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2009.v13.i2.290Keywords:
Service, Post Service, LoyaltyAbstract
Service and post-service are important factors to create customer’s loyalty, therefore, we should examine the role of service variable to loyalty with post-service variable as intervening variable. Data is collected with total respondents of 155 samples by using purposive sampling method because the total of population is not known. Questionnaire consists of 3 variables that include service with 4 indicators (officer precision, service speed, technology ability and security), post-service with 4 indicators (problem soling, responding speed, correction availability and empathy to complaints) and 3 loyalties (product commitment, information dissemination and returning to buy again).
A suitable method to answer above problems is Path Analysis. The result shows that service may have direct influence to loyalty and indirect influence that is from service to post-service as a new intervening to loyalty. Direct influence of service to loyalty that is b1 is 0,727. Indirect influence of service to post-service that is b2 is 0,509 meanwhile from post-service to loyalty, that is b3 is 0,110, therefore indirect influence, that is b2 times b2 is (0,509)*(0,110)=0,05599. Therefore, total influence of service to loyalty is direct influence that is added to indirect influence of 0,727 + 0,05599 = 0,783. It means that the influence of service and post-service is big enough to loyalty i.e. 78,3%, meanwhile the rest of it is 21,7% that is caused by other factor. Based on those results, it can be suggested that a company should give more emphasize to service and post-service because there is evidence that it may cause customer’s loyalty because customer’s loyalty is a very important factor in guaranteeing BPR durability in Ponorogo.References
Cooper, Donald R. 2006. Business Research Methods. 9 th edition. Mc Graw Hill. New York.
Deming, W. Edwards. 2003. The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, assachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study, Cambridge.
Gaspersz, Vincent. 1997. Manajemen kualitas: penerapan konsep-konsep kualitas dalam manajemen bisnis total. PT. Gramedia. Jakarta.
Ghozali, I. 2007. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Edisi III. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Kotler. 1999. Manajemen Pemasaran. Pearson Education Asia Pte. Ltd dan PT. Prenhallindo. Jakarta.
Mashariono, Oetomo, H.W, Nurhandayani, Fariyana. 2005. Analisis Nilai Pelanggan yang mempengaruhi loyalitas pelanggan: Studi Kasus pada bank BPR di Ponorogo. Penelitian Kelompok. STIESIA, Surabaya.
Napitupulu, D. 2002. Analisis Pengaruh Evaluasi Konsumen, Kepuasan, Kepercayaan dan Komitmen Terhadap Pengguna Matahari Club Card (MCC) di Plaza Tunjungan Surabaya. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional. Surabaya, Tesis.
Parasuraman A., Valerie A. Zenthaml, and Leonard L Berry. 2005. “A conceptual Model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of marketing. Fall 49 (4) : 41-50.
Rachmawati, D. 2003. Analisis Pengaruh Komitmen Dan Kepercayaan Terhadap Loyalitas Nasabah Bank Jatim cabang utama UP. Kapas Krampung Surabaya, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional. Surabaya, Tesis.
Ramadania. 2002. Kepercayaan dan Komitmen Sebagai Perantara Kunci Relationship Marketing Dalam Membangun Loyalitas. Universitas Tanjungpura. Pontianak. Tesis.
Sudaryoto. 2003. Pengaruh Kepuasan, Kepercayaan Dan Komitmen Terhadap Loyalitas Pelanggan Studi Kasus Pada PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya Surabaya Selatan, Universitas Muhammadiyah. Surabaya, Tesis.
Tjiptono F. 2005. Manajemen Jasa. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta.
Zeithaml, Valerie and Leonard L Berry and Parasuraman. 1996. “The behavioral consequences of service quality “ Journal of Marketing. 60. April 31-46