DAMPAK KODE ETIK PADA PENGARUH FILOSOFI ETIS DAN INTENSITAS ETIS TERHDADAP PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN ETIS AKUNTAN PUBLIK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2017.v1.i2.2634Keywords:
kode etik, filosofi etis, intensitas etis, akuntan publikAbstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengukur peran kode etik dalam memperkuat pengaruh filosofi etis yaitu idealisme, relativisme, dan intensitas etis yaitu magnitude of consequence, social consensus dan temporal immediacy pada pengambilan keputusan etis. Sampel penelitian ini menggunakan 138 akuntan publik. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan analisis regresi moderasi. Hasilnya memperlihatkan bahwa kode etik menurunkan pengaruh idealisme terhadap kesadaran etis akuntan publik. Kode etik dan idealisme merupakan faktor-faktor yang saling melengkapi, sehingga implikasi kode etik merupakan alat penting dalam rangka penerapan pemikiran kaum idealis pada praktik akuntan publik. Kode etik yang dapat menurunkan pengaruh positif idealisme terhadap kesadaran etis berarti bahwa kode etik mendorong setiap akuntan publik untuk mematuhi aturan etis universal dalam mencapai hasil usaha yang terbaik. Fakta yang menunjukkan pemikiran para idealis berpengaruh kuat terhadap kesadaran etis menggambarkan idealime yang kuat, dan adanya kode etik yang kuat yang dapat menurunkan pengaruh idealisme dalam pengambilan keputusan etis mengartikan kekuatan relativisme sebagai dasar pengambilan keputusan etis. Kombinasi antara idealisme dan relativisme kuat merupakan posisi situationis di dalam taxonomy of ethical ideology.References
Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior; Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes. Academic Press. Inc-University of Massachusetts at Amherst, MA.
Barlaup, K., H. I. Dronen, dan I. Stuart. 2009. Restoring Trust in Auditing: Ethical Discernment and The Adelphia Scandal. Managerial Auditing Journal 24(2): 183-203.
Buchan, H. F. 2005. Ethical Decision Making in the Public Accounting Profession: An Extention of Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics 61(2): 165-181.
Callanan G. A., P. F. Roterberry, D. F. Perri, dan P. Oehlers. 2010. Contextual Factors as Moderators of the Effect of Employee Ethical Ideology on Ethical Decission–Making. International Journal of Management 27(1): 52.
Chan, S. Y. S. dan P. Leung. 2006. The Effects if Accounting Students’ Ethical Reasoning and Personal Factors on Their Ethical Sensitivity. Managerial Auditing Journal 21(4): 436-457.
Craft, L. 2013. A Review of The Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature – 2004 – 2011; Organizational Leadership, Policy and Development. Journal of Business Ethics 117(2): 221-259.
Croxford, J. L. 2010. Determinant of Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Accountant in a Multinational Firm. Dissertation. Capella University. Minneapolis.
Cullinan, C., D. Bline, R. Farrar, dan D. Lowe. 2008. Organization Harm vs. Organization-Gain Ethical Issues: An Exploratory Examination of The Effects of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Business Ethics 80(2): 225–235.
Dickerson, C. 2009. Ethical Decision Making in Public Accounting: Investigating Factors that Influence Auditors’ Ethical Sensitivity. Dissertation. Clarement Graduate University. California.
Elango B., K. Paul, S. K. Kundu, dan S. K. Paudel. 2010. Organizational Ethics, Individual Ethics, and Ethical Intentions in International Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 97(4): 543–561.
Ferrell, O. C., J. Fraedrich, dan L. Ferrell. 2011. Business Ethics Ethical Decision Making and Cases. Edisi 8. South-Western Cengage Learning 5191 Natorp Boulevard, Mason, OH 45040. USA.
Ford, R. C. dan W. D. Richardson. 1994. Ethical Decision Making: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13: 205–221.
Forsyth, D. R. 1980. A. Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology 39(1): 175.
Gaffikin M. dan ASL. Lindawati. 2012. The Moral Reasoning of Public Accountants in The Development of a Code of Ethics: The Case of Indonesia. Australian Accounting Business and Finance Journal 6(1): 10.
Gilbert, D. R., J. A. F. Stoner, dan E. Freeman. 2009. Management. 6th Edition. Pearson Publication.
Greenfield, Jr. A. C., C. S. Norman, dan B. Wier. 2007. The Effect of Ethical Orientation and Professional Commitment on Earnings Management Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 83(3): 419-434.
Haines, R. dan L. N. K. Leonard. 2007. Situational Influence on Ethical Decision-Making in an IT Context. Information dan Management 44(3): 313-320.
Hofmann, E., E. Hoelzl, dan E. Kirchler. 2007. A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 82(1): 171-187.
Ionescu, L. 2010. Exploring The Ethics of Accounting. Contemporary Reading in Law and Social Justice 2(1): 158-163.
Jin, D. 2012. A Review of the Empirical Literature on Ethical Decision Making: 2004–2010. Tsinghua University–School of Economics & Management. Center for Leadership Research and Development, SSRN.
Jones, M. T. 1991. Ethical Decision Making by Individual in Organization: An Issue-Contingent Model. The Academy of Management Review 16(2): 366–395.
Kareacer, S., R. Gohar, M. Aygun, dan C. Sayin. 2009. Effects of Personal Values on Auditor’s Ethical Decisions: A Comparison of Pakistani and Turkish Professional Auditors. Journal of Business Ethics 88(1): 53-64.
Leung, P. dan B. J. Cooper. 2005. Accounting, Ethical Issues and The Corporate Governance Context. Australian Accounting Review 15(35): 79-88.
Lin, C. dan Y. Ho. 2008. An Examination of Cultural Differences in Ethical Decision Making Using The Multidimensional Ethics Scale. Social Behaviour and Personality 36(9): 1213-1222.
Lv, W. L. dan Y. Huang. 2012. How Workplace Accounting Experience and Gender Affect Ethical Judgement. Social Behaviour and Personality 40(9): 1477-1484.
Maree, K.W. dan S. Radloff. 2007. Factor Affecting Ethical Judgement of South African Chartered Accountant. Meditari Accounting Research 15(1): 1-18.
Marques, P. A. dan J. Azevedo-Pereira. 2009. Ethical Ideology and Ethical Judgements in The Portuguese Accounting Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 86(2): 227–242.
McKinney, J. A., T. L. Emerson, dan M. J. Neubert. 2010. The Effects of Ethical Codes on Ethical Perceptions of Actions Toward Stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics 97(4): 505–516.
McMahon, J. M. dan R. J. Harvey. 2007. The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. Journal of Business Ethics 72(4): 335–357.
Musbah, A. Y. S. 2010. The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables, and Moral Intensity Dimen- sions in Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making: A Study of Management Accounting in Libya. Disertation. University of Huddersfield Business School. Queensgate, England.
Ng, J. W., G. P. A. Lee, dan A. Moneta. 2009. Design and Validation of a Novel New Instrument for Measuring the Effect of Moral Intensity on Accountants’ Provensity to Manage Earnings. Journal of Business Ethics 84(3): 367–387.
Nguyen N. T. dan M. D. Biderman. 2008. Studying Ethical Judgments and Behavioral Intentions Using Structural Equations: Evidence from the Multidimensional Ethics Scale. Journal of Business Ethics 83(4): 627–640.
Pflugrath, G., N. M. Bennie, dan C. Liang. 2007. The Impact of Codes of Ethics and Experience on Auditor Judgments. Managerial Auditing Journal 22(6): 566-599.
Ross dan Robertson. 2003. A Typology of Situational Factors: Impact on Sales-person Decision-Making About Ethical Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 46(3): 213-234.
Shafer, E. W. 2008. Ethical Climate in Chinese CPA Firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(7): 825-835.
Shaw, J. 2006. Intention in Ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36(2): 187-223.
Suartana, I. W. 2010. Akuntansi Keperilakuan–Teori dan Implementasi. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.
Sweeney, B. dan F. Costello. 2009. Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making: An Empirical Examination of Undergraduate Accounting And Business Students. Accounting Education: An International Journal 18(1): 75–97.
Wolk, H. I., J. L. Dodd., dan J. J. Rozycki. 2008. Accounting Theory: Conceptual Issues in A Political and Economic Environment. Seventh Edition. Sage Publications Inc.