PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP MOTIVASI, KEPUASAN KERJA DAN KINERJA KARYAWAN (Studi Pada Perusahaan Pengolahan Kayu Skala Besar di Jawa Timur)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2006.v10.i1.258Keywords:
Organization culture, Motivation, Job satisfaction, Job performance, Human behavior, and Productivity.Abstract
The purpose of this research is to find out how big is the effect of organization culture to ward motivation, job satisfaction and employee’s job performance, especially on the employee’s in the production area. The analytical unit is the employee’s in production area sub sector in wood industry in East Java.The research result states that organization culture positively effects motivation, this normal because with organization culture she/ he has someone can reflects her/ his behavior in her/ his working environment. This behavior will be seen in her/ his attitude to the job as the place to fulfill their need and will.The existing phenomenon is that if someone’s behavior is assessed impressive to others or productive to the organization then that can reflects or represent the ability possessed. Individual behavior to ward the organization or their job will be effected by organization culture, this will be found out when the person is doing his/ her job sincerely or not.It is proven in this research that organization culture will be positively effected to someone’s job satisfaction. High performance is everybody’s expectation in the company, but a positive and productive performance will not be achieved if individual behavior is not in the same direction with the company goal. The more positive someone’s behavior will definitely effect her/ his performance, this is proven when the researcher tested the hypothesis that motivation effects the job satisfaction and job satisfaction effects the performance. The result of the direct effect on employee’s motivation toward job satisfaction is 1.659, the direct effect job satisfaction toward job performance is 0.103, the direct effect organization culture toward job performance is 0.127. Besides theoretical findings that were found during the research, the empirical findings were also found: first, the seventh hypothesis states that there are no different employee’s job satisfaction in middle and big companies, P (0.112 ) ≥ α (0.05), therefore the seventh hypothesis cannot be accepted. The second, the eighth hypothesis states that there are different employee’s performance in middle and big companies, P (0.001) ≤ α (0.05), therefore the eighth hypothesis can be accepted.The research result also can give information to Human Resources Manager about the importance of observing and understanding the existing factors in organizational behavior for employees behavior can be directed to the company’s goal in which is established.
References
Beach, Lee Roy. 1993. Making The Right Decision Organiztional Culture, Vision and Planning. Prentice-Hall Inc. United States of America.
Bliss, Wliam G. 1999. Why is Corporate Important? Work force: 8-9.
Buchanan, David & Huncznski Andrzej. 1997. Organizational Behavior an Introductory Text Third Edition. Prentice Hall. Europe.
Cascio, Wayne F. 1995. Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of worklife, Profits Fourth Edition. McGraw Hill Inc. Singapore.
Dole, Carol & Schroeder Richard G. 2001. The Impact of Varios Factors on the Personality, Job Satisfaction and Turn Over Intentions of Profesional Accountants. Managerial Auditing Journal Vol. 16 No.4: 234-245.
Ferdinand, Augusty. 2002. Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen. BP UNDIP. Semarang.
Gachter, Simon & Falk Armin. 2000. Work Motivation, Institutions and Performance. The Participants of the first Asian Conference on Eperimental Business Research at the Hongkong University of Science and Tehnology.Working Paper: 1-18.
Ghozali, Imam (2004). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Amos Ver 5,0. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang.
Glaser, Susan R; Zamanou Sonia & Hacker Kenneth. 1987. Measuring and Interpreting Organizational Culture. Management Communication Quartely Vol.1 No.2: 173-178.
Herpen, Marco; Praag Mirjan & Cools Kees. 2002. The Effects of Performance Measurement and Compensation on Motivation and Emperical Study. Conference of The Performance Measurement Association in Boston: 1-34.
Hofstede, Geert. 1986. Culture’s Consequences, International Differences in Work-Related Values. Sage Publication. Beverly Hills/ London/ New Delhi.
Hughes, Richard L.; Ginnet Robert C. & Curply Gordon J. 1999. Leadership Enhancing the Lessons of Experience. Irwin McGraw-Hill. Singapore.
Igalens, J. & Roussell. 1999. A Study of The Relationship between Compensation Package, Work Motivation and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior (20): 1003-1025.
Kartono, Kartini. 1994. Psikologi Sosial untuk Manajemen Perusahaan dan Industri. PT.Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Kinman, Gail and Kinman Russell. 2001. The Role of Motivation to Learn in Management Education. Journal of Workplace Learning Vol. 3 No. 4: 132-149.
Kotter, Jhon P. and Heskett James L. 1992. Corporate Culture and Performance. The Free Press. A Division of Mac Millan, Inc. New York.
Koesmono, Teman. 2005. Pengaruh Budaya organisasi terhadap Motivasi serta Kepuasan kerja serta Kinerja karyawan pada Perusahaan pengolahan Kayu Ekspor berskala menengah.
Kreitner, Robert & Kinicki Angelo. 1995. Organizational Behavior Third Edition. Richard D. Irwin Inc. Printed in The United State of America.
Luthans, Fred. 1992. Organizational Behavior Sixth Edition. McGraw Hill Book Co. Singapore.
Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2001. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia perusahaan. PT.Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.
Mc Kenna, Eugene and Beech Nic. 1995. The Essence of Human Resaources Management. Prentice Hall International (UK) Limited Printed and Bound in Great Britain by Tj Press. Padstow. Cornwall.
Molenaar, Keith. 2002. Corpoarte Culture, a Study of Firm With Outstanding Consideration Safety. Prosesional Safety: 18-27.
Mondy, R. Wayne and Noe Robert M. 1996. Human Resource Management. Prentice Hall International, Inc. The United States of America.
Nasarudin. 2001. Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment among The Malaysian Workforce. Proceeding of 5th Asian Academic of Management Conference. Klantan Pahang. Page 270-276.
Robbins, Stephen P. 1996. Perilaku Organisasi, Konsep-Kontroversi-Aplikasi. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. PT.Prenhalindo. Jakarta.
Robbins, Stephen P. 2001. Organizational Behavior, Upper Saddle River. Prentice-Hall Inc. New Jersey.
Soeprihantono, J. 1988. Penilaian Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan dan Pengembangan Karyawan. BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Testa, Mark R. 1999. Satisfaction with Organizational Vision, Job Satisfaction and Service Efforts: an Empirical Invetigation. Leadership & Organization Development Journal Vol. 20 (3): 154-161.
Waldman, David A. 1994. The Contribution of Total Quality Management to a Theory of Work performance. Academy of Management Review Vol. 19 (3): 210-536.
Werther, William & B. Davis Keth. 1996. Human Resaource and Personal Management Fifth Edition. McGraw Hill, Inc. Printed in The United States of America.
Zadjuli, Suroso Imam. 2001. Peranan dan Penerapan Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Serta Profesionalisasi di Era Global. Kuliah Perdana Universitas Internasional Batam Tahun Akademik 2001/2002 di Kampus Universitas Internasional Batam.