SASARAN DAN EVALUASI ANGGARAN: KETIDAKPASTIAN LINGKUNGAN DAN PENGALAMAN MANAJER SEBAGAI VARIABEL KONTINJENSI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2006.v10.i1.254Keywords:
Budget goal, Budget evaluation style, Environment uncertainty, Managerial experience, and Contingency.Abstract
Most of budgets studies have focused on budget participation. It was argument that level of participation in budgeting process is most important part of budgeting procedure. The activity could predict and reduce future uncertainty. The others components of budgeting like budget goal and budget evaluation lacked attention. This study aims to investigate the impact of budget goal difficulty and budget evaluation style on managerial performance and job satisfaction with contingency approach. Level of difficulty would arise when environment uncertainty exist. It should need different style of budget evaluation. But, experience managers seem could anticipate it. Results support hypothesis that budget goal difficulty and budget evaluation style were contingent with manager experience and environment uncertainty
References
Alim, M. N. 2003. Pengaruh Ketidakpastian Stratejik Dan Revisi Anggaran Terhadap Efektivitas Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran: Pendekatan Kontinjensi. Ventura Vol. 6. No. 3 (Desember): 317-328.Anthony, R.N. dan Govindarajan. 1998. Mangement Control Systems Ninth Edition. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. New York.Blocher, Edward J.; K.H. Chen & Thomas W. Lin. 2000. Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis Edisi Indonesia. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.Brownell, Peter. 1982. A Field Study Examination of Budgetary Participation and Locus of Control. The Accounting Review 4: 766-777.Brownell, Peter. 1983. The Motivational Impactof Management By Exception in A Budgetary Context. Journal of Accounting Research 2: 456-472.
Brownell, P. dan Mark Hirst. 1986. Reliance on Accounting Information Budgetary Participation and Task Uncertainty: Test of Three-Way Interaction. Journal of Accounting Research 24: 241-249.
Govindarajan, Vijay. 1988. A Contingency Approach to Dtartegy Implementation At The Business Unit Level: Integrating Administrative Mechanism With Strategy. Academy of Management Journal 31: 828-853.
Hartmann, Frank & F. Moers. 1999. Testing Contingency In Budgetary Research: An Evaluation of The Used Moderated Regression Analyses. Accounting, Organization & Society Vol. 2: 311-313.
Hopwood, A. 1976. Accounting And Human Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey.
Indriantoro, Nur. 1993. The Effects of Participative Budgeting on Job Performance and Job Satisfaction with Locus of Control and Cultural Dimension as Moderating Variables. Unpublished Dissertation. Kentucky University. USA.
Mia, L. dan M. Chenhall. 1994. The Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems, Functional Differentiation and Managerial Effectiveness. Accounting, Organization and Society Vol. 19 No. 1: 1-13.Morris, R.D.F. 1968. Budgeting Control is Obsolete. The Accountant (May): 654.
Muslimah, Susilawati. 1997. Dampak Gaya Kepemimpinan, Ketidakpastian, dan Informasi Job-Relevant Terhadap Perceived Usefulness Sistem Anggaran. Makalah Simposium Nasional Akuntansi I Yogyakarta.Ramantha, I Wayan. 2005. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Job Relevant Information Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Akuntansi, Bisnis, dan Manajemen Vol. 12 No. 2 Oktober: 180-189.
Riyadi, Slamet. 1998. Motivasi dan Pelimpahan Wewenang Sebagai Variabel Moderating Dalam Hubungan Antara Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Dan Kinerja Manajerial. Tesis S-2 Tidak Dipublikasikan. Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta.Rockness, H.O. 1977. Expectancy Theory in a Budgetary Setting: An Experimental Examination. The Accounting Review Vol. LII. No. 4 (October): 893-903.Shank, John K. dan Vijay Govindarajan. 1993. Strategic Cost Management. The Free Press, Maxwell McMillan. New Jersey.
