PENGARUH DESENTRALISASI, KETIDAKPASTIAN LINGKUNGAN DAN PENGENDALIAN AKUNTANSI TERHADAP KINERJA MANAJERIAL PADA PEMERINTAH KOTA BAU-BAU DAN KABUPATEN BUTON
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2007.v11.i4.241Keywords:
Decentralization, environment uncertanty, accounting control, managerial performanceAbstract
The purpose of this research is knowing the effect of decentralization, environment uncertainty and accounting control to the managerial performance. Approach which is used to test the research hypothesis is by using the statistical test. The method of data collection use survey method through questionnaire that allotted to 300 people of low and middle level manager in Governmental Office of Bau-Bau City and Buton Regency. However, the valid questionnaires to be used are 212. Independent variables in this research are decentralization (X1), environment uncertainty (X2), and accounting control (X3). While dependent variable is managerial performance (Y).
Regression coefficient of X1 variable = 0.262, X2 variable = -0.260, and X3 variable, regression coefficient = 0.307. Partial determination coefficient of X1 variable is 0.41 (41%), for X2 variable, partial determination coefficient = 0.30 (30%), and X3 variable, partial determination coefficient = 0.38 (38%). The research result indicated that the coefficient of simultaneous correlation is 0.783 (78.3%), it meant by together variable of X1, X2 and X3 are strongest correlation with managerial performance variable (Y). The coefficient of simultaneous determination is 0.612 (61.2%) it meant that by together variable of X1, X2 and X3 can explaine variance of the fluctuation of managerial performance variable (Y) is 61.2% and the remain is 38.8% determined by other factors.
The result of F-test, indicated that the result of F-Value is (109.563) > from F-table (2.65) so hypothesis which state that “Variable of X1, X2, and X3 which estimated simultaneously have affected managerial performance variable (Y), indicated that the first hypothesis has been proved or accepted, it is according to probability or significant on 0.000 (0.0 %) which be under 5 % of the tolerance limit.
The result of T test, for decentralization variable (X1) t-Value is 7.755 > t-table 1.960 it meant that decentralization significantly affected to managerial performance. For variable of environment uncertainty (X2) t-Value is 5.561 > t-table 1.960, indicated that environment uncertainty significantly affected to managerial performance. For variable of accounting control (X3) t-Value is 7.207 > t-table is 1.960 it meant that the accounting control significantly affected to managerial performance
References
Anthony, R. N., and Govindajan Vijay, 1998. Management Control Systems. 9th edition, Boston: McGraw-Hill Co.
Anthony, R. N., and Young, David W., 1999. Management Control In Nonprofit Organization. 6th Ed., Irwin Mc Grew-Hill Inc, Illinois.
Chenhall, R.H and Morris, D., 1986. The Impact of Structure, Environment and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting System. The accounting Review, Vol. 61 No. 1. pp 16-35
Chia, Y.M., (1995). Decentralization, Management Accounting System (MAS) Information Characteristic and Their Interaction Effects on Managerial Performance: A Singapore Study, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, September, p. 811- 830.
Chong V.K, 1996. Management Accounting Systems, Task Uncertainty and Managerial Performance: A Research Note, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.21, pp.415-421.
Darma Setia Emile, 2004. Pengaruh Kejelasan Sasaran Anggaran dan Sistem Pengendalian Akuntansi Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Dengan Komitmen Organisasi Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi Pada Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Kabupaten Dan Kota Se-Propinsi Daerah Istimewa Jogyakarta, SNA VII, Denpasar Bali.
Duncan, Robert B., 1972. Characteristic of Organizational Environmental and Perceived Environment Uncertanty, Administrative Science Quarterly 17, pp 313-327.
Efferin Sujoko, Darmadji Hadi. S dan Tan Yuliawati, 2004. Metode Penelitian Untuk Akuntansi: Sebuah pendekatan Praktis, Bayumedia, Malang Jatim.
Ferris, Kenneth R., 1977. Perceived Environmental Uncertanty, Organizational Adaptation, and Employee Performance: A Loggitudinal Study In Professional Accounting Firms, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp 13-25.
Fisher, Cathy, 1996. The Impact of Perceived Environmental Uncertanty and Individual Differences on Management Information Requirements: A research Note, Accounting, Orgazation and Society, Vol.12, No.4, pp 361-371.
Gerloff, E.A, 1991. Organization Theory and Design: Strategic Approach for Management. New York, McGrew-Hill.
Gordon Lawrence A and Narayanan V.K, 1984. Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Organization Structure: An Empirical Investigation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp 33-34.
Ghozali Imam, 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan program SPSS, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Gul Ferdinand A., 1991. The Effects of Management Accounting Systems and Environmental Uncertanty on Small Business Manager’s Performance, Accounting and Business Research, Vol 22, No.85, pp. 57-71.
Gul Ferdinand A and Chia Yew Ming, 1994. The Effects of Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Decentralization on Managerial Performance: A Test of Three-
Way Interaction, Accounting, Organization and Society, Vol 19, No. 5, pp 413-426
Hansen & Mowen, 2003. Management Accounting. Thomson, South-Western. United States of America.
Indriantoro Nur dan Supomo Bambang, 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi & Manajemen. Edisi Pertama. BPFE Yogyakarta.
Kuncoro Mudradjad, 2003. Metode riset untuk bisnis & Ekonomi: Bagaimana Meneliti & Menulis Tesis, Penerbit Erlangga. Jakarta.
Mardiasmo, 2000. Globalisasi Perekonomian, Sistem Ekonomi Nasional, dan Otonomi Daerah, Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. Vol 5, No. 1. Hal 1-14.
McLeod Jr., Raymond & Schell George, 2001. Management Information Systems, Eight Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc, New Jersey.
Miah, N.Z and Mia, L., (1996). Decentralization, Accounting Control and Performance of Government Organization: A New Zealand Empirical Study. Financial Accountibility & Management. Agustus, pp. 173-189.
Miliken, F.J,1987. Three Type of Perceived Uncertainty About Environment: State, Effect and Response Uncertanty. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 12 pp 133-143.
Mulyadi, 2001. Akuntansi Manajemen: Konsep, Manfaat & Rekayasa, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Muslichah, 2002. Pengaruh Variabel Kontijensi Terhadap Karakteristik Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen dan Kinerja Manajerial pada Unit Bisnis Industri Manufaktur Di Jawa timur, Disertasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Nadler, D.A and Tushman, M.L, 1988. Strategic Organizations Disign, Concept, Tools and Processes. Harper Collins, USA.
Nazaruddin Ietje, 1998. Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia. Vol. 1 No. 2 Juli, hal. 141-162.
Oentarto, Suwandi Made I dan Riyadmadji Dodi, 2004. Menggagas Format Otonomi Daerah Masa Depan. Samitra Media Utama. Jakarta.
Otley, David. T, 1980. The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis, Accounting, Organization and Society. Vol.5, pp 413-428.
Pearce II, John A. & Robins, Jr, Richard B, 1997. Strategic Management Formulation, Implemantation, and Control. Sixth edition. Richard D. Irwin, Chicago.
Porter, M.E, 1979. How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, March-April. Pp 137-145.
Siegel Gary and Macony Helene R, 1989. behavioral Accounting, South-Western Publishing Co, Cincinnati Ohio United states of America.
Simon, R ,1987. Accounting Control Systems and Business Strategy: An Empirical Analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society. pp.357-374.
Soewarno Nurlailie, 2004. Pengaruh Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Dominasi Pasar Terhadap Kinerja Unit Bisnis Stratejik melalui Strategi Bersaing dan Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen pada Perusahaan Terbuka Industri Barang Konsumsi di Indonesia, Disertasi, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Suharyadi dan Purwanto, 2004. Statistika untuk ekonomi & Keuangan Modern Buku 2, Salemba Empat, Jakarta.
Syafruddin Muhamad, 2001. Pengaruh Moderasi Dinamika Lingkungan pada Siatem Kontrol Akuntansi dan Kinerja Perusahaan, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. 4 No. 1, Januari, hal. 99-111.
Van de Ven, H. Andrew, and Drazin, Robert, 1985. The Concept of Fit in Contigency Theory, Research in Organization Bevavior. Vol. 5, pp 333-365.
___________, Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
___________, Undang-Undang Nomor 33 Tahun 2004 Tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintah Daerah.
___________., 1999, Pedoman Penyusunan Pelaporan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah, Lembaga Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
