KEBIJAKAN RESTRUKTURISASI UTANG MELALUI DEBT TO EQUITY SWAP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.231Keywords:
debt restructuring, equity swap, and cost of capital.Abstract
This research aim to obtain the understanding about debt restructuring to improve the efficiency and its productivity. An essential difference between these and the usual swapping of debt into equity is that the former allow a wider range of aplications. The firm’s owner have the option of choosing the sequence of restructuring negotiation with the creditors. The firm can combine the existing models, which is certainly with the agreement of the creditor and investor. This research has studied the choice of debt restructuring model carried out by PT X which is caused by the fact that the companies have difficulty paying their debts. Data collecting methods were conducted through literature study and field research from financial report of PT X. The result of this research indicate that PT X should choose debt for equity swap by converting their debt for equity swap that which giving lower cost of capital. By choosing debt for equity swap enable to change the liability profile from one to the other type, to create a more optimal capital structure debt equity and equity debt in what is called recapitalisation. Decision of converting their debt for equity swap will cause PT X be a mojority shareholder and increase the ability to compete with other aluminium companyReferences
Akerlof, G. 1970. The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84:485-500.Bulow, J. and K. Rogoff. 1989. A Constant Reconstructing Model of Sovereign Debt. Journal of Political Economy. Vol 97, 1:155-178. Bulow, J. & K. Rogoff. 1989. Sovereign Debt: Is to Forgive to Forget. The American Economic Review. Vol. 79, 1: 43-50.
Bulow, J. 2002. First World Governments and Third World Debt. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1: 229-254.Dewi, N. 2004. Model Restrukturisasi Utang sebagai Dampak dari Karakteristik Keuangan Perusahaan dan Kondisi Industri. E-journal Universitas Padjadjaran. www. pustaka.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/12 April 2010.Dewi, N. 2006. Pengaruh Karakteristik Keuangan Internal dan Kondisi Industri terhadap Pemilihan Model Restrukturisasi Utang serta Reaksi Pasar. E-journal Universitas Padjadjaran. www.pustaka.unpad.ac.id/wp-content/12 April 2010.Dodd, R. 2002. Sovereign Debt Restrukturing. The Financier Vol 9 No. 1-4.Fernandez, R. & R.W. Rothenthal, 1988. Sovereign Debt Renegotiations: A Strategic Analysis. NBER Working Paper 2597.Friedman, B.M. 2000. Debt Restructuring. National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 7722:1-36.Gale, D. & M. Hellwig. 1985. Incentive-Compatible Debt Contracts: The One-Period Problem. Review of Economic Studies. October, 52: 647-63 .Haryono Y. 2009. Restrukturisasi Utang Melalui Kebijakan Debt to Equity Swap dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Struktur Keuangan PT X. E-journal Universitas Sriwijaya Edisi Januari.Modigliani, F. & M.H. Miller. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review 48: 261-297. Modigliani, F. 1963. ”Corporate Income Texas and the Cost of Capital”, American Economic Review 48: 433-443.Noe T.H and Wang J. 2000. Strategic Debt Restructuring. The Society for Financial Studies 13:985-1015.Peter, D. 2003. Restructuring Corporate Debt In Latin America. International Financial Law Review:1.
