INTEGRITY, UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR, AND TENDENCY OF FRAUD

Authors

  • Gugus Irianto Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Nurlita Novianti Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Kristin Rosalina Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Brawijaya
  • Yuki Firmanto Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Brawijaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2012.v16.i2.213

Keywords:

integrity, compensation systems, unethical behavior, financial fraud

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the influence of integrity, and compensation systems on unethical behavior, and the influence of unethical behavior on tendency of fraud. The sample used in this research is the staff of financial, and procurement divisions of a higher educational institution. The result of the research indicates that integrity has no influence on unethical behavior, whilst compensation systems have an influence on unethical behavior. The other result shows that ethical environment could drive decision based on ethical principles rather than personal interest. In other words, the tendency of fraud may be reduced by the existence of ethical environment. The results of the study may be further interpreted that appropriate system, integrity, and ethical environment are determinant to ethical behavior.

References

ACFE. 2010. Report to The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse: 2010 Global Fraud Study. www.acfe.com. Accessed on 16 Agustus 2010.

Albrecht, W. S., C. C. Albrecht., and C. D. Albrecht. 2006. Fraud Examination. 2nd ed. Thomson South-Western.

Ashkanasy, N. M., S. Falkus, and V. J. Callan. 2000. Predictors of Ethical Code Use and Ethical Tolerance in the Public Sector. Journal of Business Ethics 25(3): 237-253.

Bebchuk, L. A, and J. M. Fried. 2003. Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17(3): 71–92.

Brickley, J. A., and C. M. James. 1987. The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition and Ownership Structure: The Case Banking. The Journal of Law and Economics 30(2): 161-180.

Booth, P. and A. K. Schulz. 2004. The Impact of an Ethical Environment on Managers’ Project Evaluation Judgments Under Agency Problem Conditions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29(2): 473–488.

Brass, D. J, K. D. Buterfield, and B. C. Skaggs. 1998. Relationship and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective. Academic and Management Review 23(1): 14-31.

Broadbent, J., M. Dietrich, and R. Laughlin. 1996. The Development of Principal-Agent, Contracting and Accountability Relationships in The Public Sector: Conceptual and Cultural Problems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 7(1): 259-284.

Buckley, M. R., D. S. Wiese, and M. G. Harvey. 1998. An Investigation into Dimensions of Unethical Behavior. Journal of Education for Bussiness 73(5): 284-290.

Carpenter, T. and J. Reimers. 2005. Unethical and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 60: 115–129.

Church, B. K., J. McMillan, and A. Schneider. 2001. Factors Affecting Internal Auditors’ Consideration of Fraudulent Financial Reporting during Analytical Procedures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1): 65-80.

Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. 2002. Risk Management: A Guide to Good Practice. CIMA Publishing. London.

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of The Treadway Commission (COSO). 2002. Fraudulent Financial Reporting 1987-1999: An Analysis of U.S. Public Companies. COSO. New York.

Cooper, D. and C. William Emory. 1996. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Erlangga. Jakarta

Dallas, L. L. 2002. A Preliminary Inqury into The Responsibility of Corpora-tions and their Directors and Officers for Corporate Climate: The Psychology of Enron’s Demise. Journal of Accounting and Business 2(1): 21-25.

Ghozali, I. 2001. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit UNDIP. Semarang.

Gibson, I. and Donnelly. 1997. Organisasi: Perilaku, Struktur, Proses Jilid 1 dan 2. Binarupa Aksara. Jakarta.

Gujarati, D. 1997. Basic Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, Inc. Sumarno Zain (penterjemah) Ekonometrika Dasar. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, 2001. Standar Pemeriksaan Akuntan Publik. SA Seksi 316. Pertimbangan Atas Kecurangan dalam Audit Laporan Keuangan.

Indriantoro, N. and B. Supomo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. BPFE.Yogyakarta.

Irianto, G. 2003. Skandal Korporasi dan Akuntan. Lintasan Ekonomi XX(2): 104-110.

Jain, A. K. 2001. Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys 15(1): 1320-1346

Jensen and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

Jogiyanto, H. M. 2004. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. BPFE. Yogyakarta.

Kartikasari, R. and G. Irianto. 2009. Penerapan Model Beneish dan Altman dalam Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Multi Paradigma 1(1): 155-172.

Keraf, A. 1998. Etika Bisnis: Tuntutan dan Relevansinya. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. 2009. Integritas Sektor Publik Indonesia tahun 2009. www.kpk.go.id. Accessed on 6 September 2011.

Laswad, F., R. Fisher, and P. Oyelere. 2001. Public Sector Financial Disclosure on The Internet: A Study of New Zealand Local Authorities. Discussion Paper No. 92. Commerce Division, Lincoln University.

Luthans, F. 1998. Organizational Behavior. 8th ed. Irwin McGraw-Hill. Boston.

Maesschalck, J. 2004. The Impact of New Public Management Reforms on Public Servants’ Ethics: Towards A Theory. Journal of Public Administration 82(2): 465-489.

Nicholson, W. 1997. Intermediate Microeconomics and Its Application. 7th ed. The Dryden Press. Orlando.

Parry, K. W. and S. B. Proctor-Thomson. 2002. Perceived Integrity of Transformational Leaders in Organisational Settings. Journal of Business Ethics 35(2): 75-96.

Robinson, S. L. and R. J. Bennet. 1995. A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal 38(2): 555-572.

Sekaran, U. and Bougie, R. 2010. Research Method for Business. 5th ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. USA.

Shah, A. 2007. Tailoring The Fight Against Corruption to Country Circum-stances. in A. Shah (Ed.) Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption. The World Bank. Washington DC.

Singarimbun, M. and Effendi. 1995. Metode Penelitian Survei. Penerbit LP3ES. Jakarta.

Soselisa, R. and Mukhlasin. 2008. Pengaruh Faktor Kultur Organisasi, Manajemen, Strategik, Keuangan, dan Auditor terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi: Studi pada Perusahaan Publik di Indonesia. Paper presented at the Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XI. Pontianak.

Ssonko, D. K. W. 2010. Ethics, Accountability, Transparency, Integrity and Professionalism in the Public Service: The Case of Uganda. Working papers, presented at Capacity Building Workshop for Public Sector Human Resource Managers in Africa on “Strengthening Human Resource Capacities for the Achievement of the Millennium Development Goals and Africa’s Development,” 12-16 April.

Sugiono. 2002. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Cetakan Keempat. CV Alfabeta. Bandung.

Tang, T. L. P. and R. K. Chiu. 2003. Income, Money Ethic, Pay Satisfaction, Commitment, and Unethical Behavior: Is The Love of Money The Root of Evil for Hong Kong Employees?. Journal of Business Ethics 46: 13-20.

Thoyibatun, S., M. Sudarma, and E. G. Sukoharsono. 2010. Analysing The Influence of Internal Control Compliance and Compensation System Against Unethical Behavior and Accounting Fraud Tendency (Studies at State University in East Java). Paper presented at the Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII. Palembang.

Troy C., M. A. Domino, and S. P. Landry. 2009. Exploring Accounting Fraud in The Subsidiary Environment. Journal of Business & Economics Research 7(1): 13-21.

Van Rijckeghem, C., and B. Weder. 1997. Corruption and The Rate of Temptation: Do Low Wages in The Civil Service Cause Corruption? IMF Working Paper. WP/97/73.

Wilopo. 2006. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh terhadap Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi: Studi pada Perusahaan Publik dan Badan Usaha Milik Negara di Indonesia. Paper presented at the Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX. Padang.

Wilopo. 2010. Etika Profesi: Telaah pada Profesi Akuntan, Kasus-Kasus Kecurangan. Working papers, presented at the Kuliah Tamu Program Doktor Ilmu Manajemen Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Brawijaya. Malang, 21 April.

Zairi, M., Y. Jarar , and Aspinwall. 2010. A Reward, Recognition, and Appraisal System for Future Competitiveness: A UK Survey of Best Practices. Working paper, www.ecbpm.com.

Published

2018-09-13

Issue

Section

Artikel