PROSES PENYUSUNAN ANGGARAN DAN PENILAIAN KINERJA DITINJAU DARI ASPEK PERILAKU (Studi Kasus Pada Perguruan Tinggi Swasta ”X” Di Surabaya)

Authors

  • Endang Dwi Retnani Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia (STIESIA) Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2009.v13.i1.207

Keywords:

budgeting, financial performance, balanced scorecard, key performanc indicators

Abstract

This study intends to find out the impact of planning and budgeting processes and performance measures on the behaviour of the responsibility center managers employed in a private university “X”. Method used in this study was qualitative research approach.

The results showed that planning and budgeting submission processes with a bottom up participative approach influenced the behaviour of the responsibility center managers. Their appreciation and togetherness feeling was developed, as well as their commitment to execute the planned program and budgeting. Secondly, in the case that the approved planning and budgeting was implemented not as expected and planned without any explanation yielded a negative behaviour to the central managers that were shown by their less optimum potential works or with no action at all. Thirdly, financial performance measured with variant analysis was not reflecting the real performance of the responsibility center managers. The fact could cause misinterpretation of the management and also negative impact. It brought frustration among the responsibility center managers who actually had good performance. Furthermore, performance measurement, that is mainly based on financial aspects and neglecting non financial ones, influenced the reluctance of the responsibility center managers who just considered short term purposes and reluctant to make innovation. And last, by following steps suggested in the Balanced Scorecard, it could be able to define the Key Performanc Indicators of responsibility center managers with taking into consideration either financial or non financial aspects.

References

Argyris, C., 1952. The Impact Budget On People. The Controllership Foudation. Cornel University, The School Of Business and Public Adminsistration.

---------------,1952. Problems with Budget, Harvard Business Review.

Becker, S. Green. D., 1966. Budgeting and employee behavior. Journal of Business, 392-402.

Bungin,B., 2003. Analisis data penelitian kualitatif: Pemahaman filosofis dan metodologis ke arah penguasaan model aplikasi. Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Emsley, David., 2000. Variance analisis an performance: Two emperical studies, Accounting Organization and Society, 25 1-12.

Ferris, Kenneth R, Haskins, Mark E. Perspective On accounting system and behavior, Accounting , Auditing and Accountability.

Hansen, D.R. dan M. Mowen. 2003. Management accounting, 6th edition, Ohio : South Western College Publishing.

Hopwood G.A., 1972. En emparical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Researh, 10, 156-182.

Kaplan,Robert S. and Norton David P., 1996. Balanced Scorecard : Translating Strategy Into Action. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press

---------------------, 2001. The Strategy-Focused Organization, How Balance Scorecard Companies Thrive in The New Business Environment, Harvard Businesss School Press.

Lybby, T., 1999. The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a partisipative budgeting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 21, 25-137

Marmen, Jerry., 2003. Developing strategy-focused organization using the balance scorecard for higher education institutions. Workshop, Jakarta.

Moleong, Lexy J. 1996. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset

Mulyadi., 2000. Akuntansi Manajemen. Edisi 3, BPFE STIE YKPN, Yogyakarta.

Siegel, G and Marconi, H, R., 1989. Behavioral Accounting. South Western Publishing Co, Cicinati West Chicago

Shank, J. K and Govindarajan., 1993. Strategic cost management. New York: The Free Press.

Wentzel, K., 2000. The influence of fairness perception and goal comitment on manager performance in budget setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, vol.14.

Yin, Robert K. 2000. Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Edisi Revisi. Terjemahan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Perkasa.

Published

2018-09-12

Issue

Section

Artikel