OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE, DIVIDEND PAYMENT, AGENCY COST AND CORPORATE VALUE (SUATU PENGUJIAN MODEL STRUKTURAL)

Authors

  • Isti Fadah Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2010.v14.i1.199

Keywords:

Ownership Structure, Dividend Payment, Agency Cost And Corporate Value

Abstract

The  agency problem come because of separation between ownership and management on large corporate, there is a conflict between shareholder as an owner and manager as an agent. Manager focus on high growth of corporate (low dividend) but the owner prefer high dividend. The aims of the research are (1)  to analysis the effect of free cash flow, risk and ownership structure to dividend payment ,(2) to analysis the effect of free cash flow, risk and ownership structure to  agency cost. (3) to analysis the effect of dividend payment to corporate value, and (4) to analysis the effect of and agency cost  to corporate value The technique sampling is purposive sampling. Secondary data is used in this research. It is from financial report like balance sheet, financial statement and cash flow report. It is gotten from Indonesian Stock Exchange. The research period is 2000 up to 2006. It uses pooled data ( joint of time series data and cross section data) so the analysis units are 271 (n=271).  To Analysis data  is used descriptive  analysis and also statistical analysis that’s name  structural equation model (SEM). It uses structural equation model (SEM) because the model has a ladder causality relationship and several variable like ownership structure, agency cost, risk , dividend payment and corporate value are latent variables.  The results show that (1)  risk has a positive significant effect to the agency cost, It means that agency cost can reduce the risk especially high risk investment that manger can do.  (2) Dividend payment  has a positive significant effect to the corporate value, It supports the-birds-in-the-hand theory and (3) risk has a positive significant effect to the corporate value. It means that investor always care about risk of corporate where they will invest.

References

Ang, James S et.al., 2000. Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance VolL X : 81-106

Brigham, EF dan Phillip R. Daves. 2003. Intermediate Financial Management, eight edition, Thomson, South Western.Cooper, Cary.L dan Chris Argyris. 1997. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management. Vol. VIII. Finance. Blackwell Publishers Inc. USA. Chen C.R dan T. Steiner. 1999. Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflict: A NonLinier Simultaneus Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividen Policy. Financial Review .34 : 119-136.Crutchley,C. dan R. Hansen. 1989. A Test Of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management (Winter): 36-46.Dempsey, Stephen J. dan Laber, Jane. 1992. Effects of Agency and Transaction Costs on Dividend Payout Ratios: Futher Evidence of the Agency-transaction Cost Hypothesis. Journal of Financial research Vol. 4 : 317-321.Easter brook,F. 1984. Two Agency Cost Explanation of Divideds. American EconomicReview 74 : 650-659.

Eckbo B. Espen, Savita Verma, 1994, Managerial Share Ownership, Voting Power, and Cash Dividend Policy, Journal of Corporate Finance1 : 33-62.Ferdinand, Augusty. 2002. Structural Equation Modelling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen.BP UNDIP

Heinfeldt, Jeffery dan Curcio, Richard. 1997. Employee Management Strategy, Stakeholder-Agency Theory, and The Value of The Firm. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions Vol. 10 : 67-75

Jensen,M.dan W. Meckling .1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial bahavior Agency Cost, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance 3: 305-360.

Jong, Abe de, Ronald van Dijk and Chris Veld. 2002. The Dividend and Share Repurchase Policies of Canadian Firms: Empirical Evidence Based on A New Research Design, Departement of Finance, Florida State University, Talahassee

Manos, Ronny, 2002, Dividend Policy and Agency Theory: Evidence on Indian Firms, Finance and Development Research Programe, Working Paper Series No 41, University of Manchaster

Mollah AS. Keasey Kevin dan Short Helen. 2000. The Influence of Agency Cost on Dividend Policy in an Emerging Market : Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange

Miller,M.H., and F. Modigliani. 1961. Dividend policy Growth and the Valuation of Shares. Journal of Business (October) : 411-433.

Ross, Steppen A., Westerfield, dan Jaffe. 2002. Corporate Finance, 6th edition, Irwin McGraw-Hill, Chicago.

Rozeeff,M. 1982. Growth, Beta and agency Cost as Determinants of Dividend Payout Ratios. Journal of Financial Research 5 : 249-259.

Schooley, diane K. dan Barney, Dwayne. 1994. Using Dividend Policy and Managerial Ownership to Reduce Agency Costs. Journal of Financial Research 3 : 363-373.

Van Horne, J. C. dan J.W. Wachowicz Jr. 1995. Fundamental of Financial Management, Ninth Edition, Prentice-Hall International, Inc., Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey,

Weston, JF., dan EF. Brigham. 1993. Essentials of Managerial Finance Tenth edition, The Dryden Press, New York.

Published

2018-09-13

Issue

Section

Artikel