DESENTRALISASI, SISTEM PENGENDALIAN AKUNTANSI DAN KINERJA DINAS PADA PEMERINTAH KOTA PALANGKA RAYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2009.v13.i4.180Keywords:
Decentralization, Accounting Control System, Performance and Part AnalysisAbstract
This paper reports the results of a study which was conducted in government offices in Palangka Raya and investigated the relationships between (a) decentralization and the use of accounting control systems, (b) the use of accounting control systems and government office performance, and (c) the decentralization and government office performance. The performance was assessed using the heads of office perception of their office (unit's) performance. Samples taken in the research, were involved government offices in Palangka Raya. Analysis units utilized were the heads of offices, since they were mostly involved in budget processing in the offices. Data were collected through questionnaires, out of 112 questionnaires sent, only 66 questionnaires could be processed. The answers of the respondences are analyzed by using path analysis. The result showed that decentralization and accounting control system influence the performance. But empirically result shows that decentralization had no significant effect on performance. This study indicated that accounting control system was a mediator in the relationship between decentralization and performanceReferences
Anthony, Robert N. dan David W. Young. 2001. Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. Sixth Edition. IRWIN.
Atmosudirdjo, Prajudi. 1997. Membangun Visi dan Reorientasi Kinerja Aparatur Daerah, Menjawab Tantangan Masyarakat Indonesia Baru. Manajemen Pembangunan. No. 19 Tahun V, April Jakarta
Chenhall, R.H. dan D. Morris. 1986. The Impact of Structure, Envirotment and Interdependence on Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting System. The Accounting Review pp: 16-35.
Chia, Y. M, 1995. Decentralization, Management Accounting System Information Characteristic and Their Interaction Effects on Managerial Performance: A Singapore Study, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, pp. 811-830.
Ghozali Imam. 2001. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gordon, L.A dan V.K. Narayanan, 1984. Management Accounting Systems, Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Organization Structure: An Empirical Investigation. Accounting, Organization and Society, pp: 33-37.
Gul, F.A., J.S.L. Tsui, S.C.C. Fong., dan H.Y.L. Kwok. 1995. Desentralisation as a Moderating Factor in the Budgetary Participation-Performance Relationship: Some Hongkong Evidence. Accounting and Business Research. Vol 25, No. 98, pp 107-113.
Heller, F. A dan Yulk. 1969. Participation Managerial Decision-Making and Situational Variable, Organizational Behavaior and Human Performance, pp. 230.
Indriantoro. N. dan Supomo. B., 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen, Edisi Pertama. Cetakan Kedua. BPFE- Jogjakarta
Kaiser. H. F dan J. Rice. 1974. Little Jippy, Mark IV, Educational and Psychologycal Measurement, Vol. 34. No. 1 (spring): 111-117.
Khandawalla, P.N. 1972. The Effect on Different Type of Competition on Use of Management Controls. Journal of Accounting Research (Auntumn). pp. 275-285
Levine, Charles H., B. Guy Peters dan Frank J. Thomson. 1990. Public Administration; Challenge, Choices, Consequences. Illinois: Scott, Foremansilittle, Brown Higher Education.
Mardiasmo. 2002. Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.
Mardiasmo. 2002. Otonomi Daerah Sebagai Upaya Memperkokoh Basis Perekonomian Daerah. Makalah disampaikan dalam Seminar Pendalaman Ekonomi Rakyat, Krisis Moneter Indonesia. Jakarta, 7 Mei 2002
Mia, L. dan M. Goyal. 1991. Span of Control, Task Interdependence and Usefulness of MAS Information in Non-For-Profit Government Organization. Financial Accountability and Management. Vol. 7, No. 4: 249-266.
Miah, N. Z. dan Mia, L. 1996. Desentralisation, Accounting Control and Performance of Government Organization: A New Zealand Empirical Study. Financial Accountability and Management. Vol. 12, No. 3: 173-189.
Nazaruddin, Ietje. 1998. Pengaruh Desentralisasi dan Karakteristik Informasi Sistem Akuntansi Manajemen terhadap Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia (JRAI), Vol. 1, No. 2, hal 141-162.
Osborne, David and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector, New York: Penguins Books.
Riyadi, Slamet. 2001. Motivasi dan Pelimpahan Wewenang Sebagai Variabel Moderating dalam Hubungan antara Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran dan Kinerja Manajerial. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia (JRAI), Vol. 3, No. 2, hal 134-150.
Rue, W. Leslie dan Lloyd L. Byars. 2000. Management, Skills and Application. 8th Edition. Boston: McGraw Hill Publishing Company.
Rummler, Geary A. dan Alan P. Brace. 1995. Improving Performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
Simamora, Henry. 1999. Akuntansi Manajemen. Cetakan Pertama. Penerbit Salemba Empat. Jakarta
Susanto, Azhar. 2007. Sistem Informasi Akuntansi: Konsep dan Pengembangan Berbasis Komputer. Edisi Perdana, Cetakan Kedua. Penerbit Lingga Jaya. Bandung.
