PENGARUH TEKANAN WAKTU AUDIT DAN LOCUS OF CONTROL TERHADAP TINDAKAN YANG MENURUNKAN KUALITAS AUDIT

Authors

  • Kurnia Kurnia Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2011.v15.i4.162

Keywords:

Audit Time Pressure, Locus of Control and Reduced Audit Quality

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of audit time pressure and locus of control on reduced audit quality. Based on the literature review, it was hypothesized that audit time pressure and locus of control have a significant effect on reduced audit quality. This research was done on auditors of audit firms listing Bapepam-Lembaga Keuangan (LK). Data was collected through questionnaires. The respondents of this research are junior auditors, senior, supervisor, and manager. Data were analyzed using path analysis for testing hypothesis. The results show that audit time pressure and locus of control have a significant effect on reduced audit quality. Spesifically, this study indicate that auditors who experience greater level of time pressure are more likely to commit reduced audit quality. Under conditions of excessive time pressure, auditors failed to adequately use all relevant decision cues. The results also indicate that auditors who are more likely to engage in reduced audit quality tend to possess an external locus of control. This indicate that the personality characteristics (instance, locus of control) play a role increasing audit quality. Since an external locus of control is associated with higher acceptance of audit quality reduction behaviors, audit firms may need to tailor their professional development programs and management practices to reflect an auditor’s locus of control.

References

Arens, Alvin A., R.J. Elder, M.S. Beasley. 2008. Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Eleventh Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall.

Coram, Paul; Juliana Ng dan D. Woodliff. 2003. A Survey of Time Budget Pressure And Reduced Audit Quality Among Australian Auditors. Autralian Accounting Review 13(1): 119-139.

Coram, Paul; Juliana Ng dan D. Woodliff. 2004. The effect of risk misstatement on the propensity to commit reduced audit quality act under time budget pressure. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(20): 159-167.

DeZoort, F.T dan A.T. Lord. 2002. A review and synthesis of pressure effects: research in accounting. Journal of Accounting Literature 16: 28-85.

Donnelly, D. P.; J.J.Quirin. dan D.O’Bryan. 2003. Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: an explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics. Behavioral Research In Accounting 15: 87-110.

Frucot, Veronique dan W.T. Shearon. 2001. Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review 73 (1): 80-99.

Gibson, J.L; J.M. Ivancevich; J.H. Donnelly; Konopaske. 2003. Organization: behavior, structure, processes.

Glover, Steven. 2000. The influence of time pressure and accountability on auditors’ processing of nondiagnostic information. Journal of Accounting Research 35(2): 213-226.

Herbach, Olivier. 2001. Audit Quality, Auditor Behavior and The Psychological Contract. The European Accounting Review 10 (4): 787-802.

Hyatt, Troy A. and D. F. Prawitt. 2001. Does congruence between audit structure and auditors’ locus of control affect job performance. The Accounting Review 76(2): 263-274.

Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia Kompartemen Akuntan Publik. 2001. Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik. Penerbit: Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Jones, Gwen E. dan M.J. Kavanagh. 2000. An experimental examination of the effect of individual and situational factors on unethical behavioral intentions in the workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15: 511-523.

Kelley, Tim dan L. Margheim. 2003. The impact of time budget pressure, personality, and leadership variables on dysfunctional auditor behavior. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 21 (2): 21-42.

Kelley, Timothi; L. Margheim; dan D. Pattison. 2000. Survey on the differential effects of time deadline pressure versus time budget pressure on auditor behavior. The Journal of Applied Business Research 15(4): 117-128.

Knouse dan Giacalone. 2002. Ethical decision-making in business: behavioral issues and concerns. Journal of Business Ethics 11: 367-377.

Kreitner, Robert dan A. Kinicki. 2005. Organizational Behavior, 5th Edition. McGraw-Hill. New York. USA.

Lee, Linda dan T. Murff. 2006. An analysis of job stress outcomes among bank internal auditors. Bank Accounting & Finance 19(4): 39-43.

Liyanarachchi, Gregory dan S. McNamara. 2007. Time budget pressure in New Zealand Audits. Business Review 9(2): 61-68.

Malone, Charles F. dan R. W. Roberts. 2004. Factors Associated with the Incidence of Reduced Audit Quality Behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23(2): 49-64.

McNair, C.J. 2007. Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organization and Society 23(7): 42-57.

Muawanah, Umi. 2000. Perilaku auditor dala situasi konflik audit: peran locus of control, komitmen profesi, dan kesadaran etis. SNA II.

Otley, David dan B.J. Pierce. 2001. The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 15(2): 65-85.

Pierce, B. dan B. Sweeney. 2004. Cost-quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigation. European Accounting Review 13(3): 415-441.

Power, M.K. 2003. Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28: 379-394.

Pusat Pembinaan Akuntan Publik dan Jasa Penilai, Departemen Keuangan RI. 2010. Hasil pemeriksaan Kantor Akuntan Publik Tahun 2008 – 2009.

Raghunathan, Bhanu. 2006. Premature signing-off of audit procedures: an analysis. Accounting Horizons 5(2): 71-79.

Reiss, Michelle dan K. Mitra. 2001. The effects of individual difference factors on the acceptability of ethical and unethical workplace behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics 19: 1581-1593.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2003. Organizational Behavior, 12th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. New Jersey. USA.

Robertson, Jesse C. 2007. Staff Auditor Reporting Decisions Under Time Deadline Pressure. Managerial Auditing Journal 22(4): 340-353.

Soobaroyen, Teerooven dan C. Chengabroyan. 2006. Auditors’ Perceptions of Time Budget Pressure, Premature Sign Offs and Under-Reporting of Chargeabel Time: Evidence from a Developing Country. International Journal of Auditing 10(3): 201-218.

Spilker, B.C dan D.F. Prawitt. 2003. Adaptive responses to time pressure: the effects of experience on tax information search behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting 9: 172-198.

Tsui, Judi S.L. dan F. A. Gull. 2000. Auditors’ behavior in an audit conflict situation: a research note on the role of locus of control and ethical reasoning. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 16(1): 41-51.

Willett, C. dan M. 2007. A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. British Accounting Review 35(2):101-120.

Published

2018-09-07

Issue

Section

Artikel