PENGARUH FEE AUDIT, ROTASI KAP, DAN REPUTASI AUDITOR TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2012.v16.i1.147Keywords:
Kualitas audit, biaya audit, rotasi auditor, reputasi auditorAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh fee audit, rotasi KAP, dan reputasi auditor. Didasarkan pada review literature, diduga bahwa variable fee audit, rotasi KAP, dan reputasi auditor berpengaruh terhadap kualitas auditor. Data yang digunakan adalah laporan keuangan auditan dari perusahaan manufaktur yang tergabung dalam LQ-45 mulai tahun 2004-2010. Pengujian dilakukan dengan regresi. Dari hasil uji statistik terbukti bahwa: Fee audit berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit, sementara rotasi dan reputasi audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap kualitas audit. Kemungkinan yang pertama, disebabkan oleh keengganan pihak pelaku pasar untuk mengeksplorasi lebih jauh apakah auditor yang mengeluarkan opini pada laporan keuangan auditan benar-benar pernah mengalami rotasi atau tidak. Kemungkinan kedua, pelaku pasar juga tidak pernah memperhatikan apakah laporan keuangan telah diperiksa oleh auditor yang memiliki reputasi tertentu atau tidak. Ada berbagai hal yang perlu dipertimbangkan untuk penelitian kedepan. Pada dasarnya pelaku pasar di Indonesia sebagian besar hanya mempertimbangkan capital Gain, sehingga sangat kecil kemungkinan menggunakan analisis fundamental (laporan keuangan) sebagai bahan pertimbangan melakukan tindakan jual atau beli saham. Apabila pasar tidak mempertimbangkan secara signfikan atas analisis fundamental, sebenarnya pasar juga bisa dikatakan kurang memperhatikan hasil auditan (opini auditor).
References
Abdul, A. B., N. E. Abdul, W. S. Mustapha, & H. Mohammad. 2006. Auditor-client relationship: The Case of Audit Tenure and Auditor Switching in Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal 21(7): 737.
Adityasih, T. 2007. IAI Siap Menentang Draft Pemerintah: RUU Akuntan Publik. Majalah berita Mingguan Tempo 4(16).
Akdere, M. dan R.E. Azevedo. 2006. Agency Theory Implications for Efficient Contracts in Organization Development. Organization Development Journal 24(2): 43-54.
Alvarez Dardet, C. dan M. Capelo. 2003. Contractual Relationships and Accoun ting Change: The Case of Aguera Wholesalers, 1770-1835. Accounting History 8(1): 61.
Anandarajan, A., G. Kleinman dan D. Palmon. 2008. Auditor independence revisited: The Effects of SOX on Auditor Independence. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 5(2): 112-125.
Boon, K., J. McKinnon. dan P. Ross. 2008. Audit Service Quality in Compulsory Audit Tendering: Preparer Percep Tions and Satisfaction. Accounting Research Journal 21(2): 93-122.
Carcello, J. V. dan A. L. Nagy. 2004. Audit Firm Tenure and Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Auditing 23(2): 57-71.
Carrera, N., N. Gomez Aguilar, C. Humphrey, dan E. Ruiz Barbadillo. 2007. Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation in Spain: A Policy That Was Never Applied. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20(5): 671 - 701.
Chi, T. 2009. Scandals, Technology Spur PCAOB to Mull Revisions to Audit Confirmation Standard. Accounting Policy & Practice Report 5(8): 363-364.
Chih-Ying, C., L. Chan-Jane, dan L. Yu Chen. 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research 25(2): 415-445.
Christensen, J. 2010. Conceptual Frameworks of Accounting From an Information Perspective. Accounting and Business Research. 40(3): 287-299.
Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of The Firm. Economica. 4(16): 386–405.
Coram, P., A. Glavovic, N. Juliana, dan D.R. Woodliff. 2008. The Moral Intensity of Reduced Audit Quality Acts. Auditing 27(1): 127-149.
Dhaliwal, D. S., C. A. Gleason, S. Heitzman, dan K. D. Melendrez. 2008. Auditor Fees and Cost of Debt. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 23(1): 1-22.
Dharmasaputra, M. dan M. Nafi. 2007. Jerat Baru Para Auditor. Majalah Berita Mingguan Tempo 04(16).
Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review 14(1): 57.
Epstein, M. J. dan M. A. Geiger. 1994. Investor Veiws of Audit Assurance: Recent Evidence of The Expectation Gap. Journal of Accountancy 177(1): 60.
Fallon, N. C. 2005. The impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on Ethics in The Accounting Curriculum: A Survey of Accounting Faculty in Colleges and Universities in The United States. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses 0688(1351): 116.
Fargher, N., H. Y. Lee, dan V. Mande. 2008. The Effect of Audit Partner Tenure on Client Managers' Accounting Discretion. Managerial Auditing Journal 23(2): 161-186.
Firth, M., P. L. L. Mo, dan R. M. K. Wong. 2005. Financial Statement Frauds and Auditor Sanctions: An Analysis of Enforcement Actions in China. Journal of Business Ethics 62(4): 367-381.
Francis, J. R., dan M. D. Yu. 2009. Big 4 Office Size and Audit Quality. Accounting Review 84(5): 1521-1552.
Fung, S., H. Jo. & S. C. Tsai. 2009. Agency Problems in Stock Market-Driven Acquisitions. Review of Accounting & Finance 8(4): 388-430.
Ghosh, A. dan D. Moon. 2005. Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality. Accounting Review 80(2): 585-612.
Gul, F. A., B. L. Jaggi, dan G. V. Krishnan. 2007. Auditor Independence: Evidence on The Joint Effects of Auditor Tenure and Nonaudit Fees. A Journal of Practice & Theory 26(2): 142.
Hakim, F. & A. Omri. 2010. Quality Of The External Auditor, Information Asymmetry, And Bid-Ask Spread; Case of The Listed Tunisian Firms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management 18(1): 5-18.
He, W., T. K. Mukherjee. dan P. Wei. 2009. Agency Problems In Tracking Stock And Minority Carve-Out Decisions: Explaining The Discrepancy in Short- ind Long-Term Performances. Journal of Economics and Finance 33(1): 27-42.
Hoitash, R., A. Markelevich, dan C. A. Barragato. 2007. Auditor Fees and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal 22(8): 761 - 786.
Jackson, A. B., M. Moldrich, dan P. Roebuck. 2008. Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation and Audit Quality. Managerial Auditing Journal 23(5): 420 - 437.
Jankovic, I. 2009. Firm As a Nexus of Markets. SSRN Working Paper Series n/a.
Jensen, M. C., dan W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4); 305–360.
Johnson, V. E., I. K. Khurana, dan J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-Firm Tenure and The Quality of Financial Reports. Contemporary Accounting Research 19(4): 637-660.
Knechel, W. R. dan A. Vanstraelen. 2007. The Relationship between Auditor Tenure and Audit Quality Implied by Going Concern Opinions. Auditing 26(1): 113-131.
Landier, A. dan D. Thesmar. 2009. Financial Contracting with Optimistic Entre preneurs. The Review of Financial Studies 22(1): 117-150.
Law, P. 2008. An Empirical Comparison of Non-Big 4 and Big 4 Auditors' Perceptions of Auditor Independence. Managerial Auditing Journal 23(9): 917 - 934.
Lugo, D. 2008. As Dangerous Audit Season Approaches, Auditor Skepticism Is Key, Panelists Say. Accounting Policy & Practice Report 4(25): 1120-1121.
Mai, D., S. Mishra, dan K. Raghunandan. 2008. Auditor Tenure and Shareholder Ratification of The Auditor. Accounting Horizons 22(3): 297-314.
Manry, D. L., T. J. Mock, dan J. L. Turner. 2008. Does Increased Audit Partner Tenure Reduce Audit Quality? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 23(4): 553-572.
Mansi, S. A., W. F. Maxwell, dan D. P. Miller. 2004. Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market. Journal of Accounting Research 42(4): 755-793.
McKee, T. A. 2010. The 'Cry Wolf' Problem in Current Fraud Auditing Standards. The CPA Journal 80(1): 60-62.
Meyer, M. J., J. T. Rigsby, dan J. Boone. 2007. The Impact Of Auditor Client Relationships on The Reversal of FirstTime Audit Qualifications. Managerial Auditing Journal 22(1): 53-79.
Miller, S. E. 2009. Governance Mechanisms As Moderators Of Agency Costs In A Pre-SOX Environment. Journal of Business & Economics Research 7(10): 15-32.
Miller, T. 2008. Who Are These People?1. Cinema Journal 47(4): 121-126,163.
Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, dan T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring The Term of The Auditor-Client Relationship and The Quality of Earnings: A Case for Mandatory Auditor Rotation? Accounting Review 78(3): 779-799.
Nagy, A. L. 2005. Mandatory Audit Firm Turnover, Financial Reporting Quality, and Client Bargaining Power: The Case of Arthur Andersen. Accounting Horizons, 19(2); 51-367.
Nieschwietz, R. J. dan D. J. Woolley. 2009. Perceptions of Auditor Independence: Evidence from Cpas', Loan Officers, and The General Public. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 13(3): 93-106.
Ong-Siong, J. 2004. SAS No. 99: A Reaction to Accounting Scandals. Accounting Today 18(13): 27-29.
Peecher, M. E., dan M. D. Piercey. 2008. Judging Audit Quality in Light of Adverse Outcomes: Evidence of Outcome Bias and Reverse Outcome Bias. Contemporary accounting research 25(1): 243-274.
Shapiro, S. P. 2005. Agency Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 31: 263-284.
Silver, S. E., A. S. Fleming, dan R. A. Riley, Jr. 2008. Preventing and Detecting Collusive Management Fraud. The CPA Journal 78(10): 46-48.
Staikouras, P. K. 2007. The Regulatory 'BigBang' on The Internal Corporate Governance of Greek Banks and its Implications. Journal of Banking Regu lation 8(3): 201-235.
Tuanakotta, T. M. 2007. Setengah Abad Profesi Akuntansi. Salemba Empat FEUI, Jakarta.
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
Yu, M. 2010. Analyst Following and Corporate Governance: EmergingMarket Evidence. Accounting Research Journal 23(1): 69-9
