MARKET STRUCTURE, CONDUCT AND PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIA BANKING INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Rizky Yudaruddin Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Mulawarman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2015.v19.i3.126

Keywords:

Indonesian banking architecture, structure-conduct-performance hypothesis, and efficiency hypothesis

Abstract

Indonesian Banking Architecture Policies (API) since 2004 has resulted in the rising of banks concentration. This increase of banks concentration raises two opposing hypotheses,structure-conduct- performance (SCP) and efficient-performance hypothesis. SCP approach is a structural approach. This approach considers that the level of profits which the bank acquired is affected by the market structure and the degree of competition.The decreasing level of competition and the increasing in concentration in an industry will lead to increased profits for these industries.This study aims to prove, whether banks in Indonesia in 2009-2013 supportstructure-conduct-performanceor efficient-performance hypotheses. The sampling method used was purposive sampling. Using banks’ financial statement data sourced fromBank Indonesia, which then analyzed with panel data regression in e-views 8 program. It’s found that banks in Indonesia support the efficient hypothesis. However, the banks efficiency has yet encourage low interest practice and thus reducing the competitiveness of the Indonesian economy in the face ofASEAN Community 2015.

References

Ajide, F. M. dan J. O Ajileye. 2015. Market Concentration And Profitability In Nigerian Banking Industry: Evidence

From Error Correction Modeling. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management3(1): 1-12.

Al-Karasnehand, Ibrahim, dan A. M. Fatheldin. 2005. Market Structure and Performance in the GCC Banking Sector: Evidence from Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and UAE. AMF Economic Papers. Number11. Arab Monetary Fund., Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: 1-46.

Al-Obaidan, A. M. 2008. Market Structure, Concentration and Performance in the Commercial Banking Industry of Emer- ging Markets. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences 12(1):104-114.

Amalia, F. dan M. E. Nasution. 2007 Perbandingan Profitabilitas Industri Perbankan Syariah dan Industri Perbankan Konvensional Menggunakan Metode Struktur Kinerja Dan Perilaku. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia 7(2):31-51.

Abbasoglu, O. F., A. A. Faruk, dan G. Ali. 2007. Concentration, Competition, Efficiency and Profitability of the Turkish Banking Sector in the Post Crises Period. Banks and Bank Systems 2(3):106.

Bhatti, G. A. dan H. Haroon. 2010. Evidence on Structure Conduct Performance Hypothesis in Pakistani Commercial Banks. International Journal of Business and Management5(9):174-187.

Chen, S.H. dan C.C.Liao. 2011. Are foreign banks more profitable than domestic banks? Home and host-country effects of banking market structure, gover- nance, and Supervision. Journal of Banking & Finance35(4): 819–839.

Chortareas, G. E., J. G. G. Garcia, dan C. Girardone. 2010. Banking Sector Performance in Some Latin American Countries: Market Power versus Efficiency. Working Paper, Banco de Mexico.N. 2010-20: 1-25.

Cooper, W.W.,L. M.Seiford, danT.Kaoru. 2006. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses with DEA-Solver Software and References. Springer Science and Business Media, Inc. New York.

Gajurel, D. P. Dan R. S. Pradhan. 2011. Structure-Performance Relation in Nepalese Banking Industri. IAC S IT Press, Manila, Philippine.IPEDR2:25-31

Gujarati, D. N. dan D. C. Porter. 2010. Essentials of Econometrics, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill/Irwin. New York.

Günalp, B. dan T. Celik . 2006. Competition In The Turkish Banking Industry. Applied Economics38(11): 1335–1342. Hauner, D. dan S. J. Peiris. 2008. Banking Efficiency and Competition In Low Income Countries: The Case of Uganda. Applied Economics40(21):2703–2720.

Hall, M. J. B. dan R. Simper. 2013. Efficiency and Competition In Korean Banking. Applied Financial Economics 23(10): 881– 890.

Hoxha, I. 2013. The Market Structure of The Banking Sector And Financially Dependen Manufacturing Sectors.International Review of Economics and Finance 27: 432–444.

Loukoianova, E. 2008. Analysis of the Efficiency and Profitability of the Japanese Banking System. IMF Working Paper. WP/08/63

Majid, M. Z. A, dan F. Sufian 2006. Consolidation and Competition in Emerging Market: An Empirical Test for Malaysian Banking Industry. Econ Change39(1): 105–124.

Maniatis, P. (2006). Market Concentration And Industry Profitability: The Case Of Greek Banking (1997-2004).International Business & Economics Research Journal 5(10): 39-48

Masood, O. dan B. S. Sergi. 2011. China’s Banking System, Market Structure, and Competitive Conditions. Front. Econ. China6(1): 22–35.

Mensi, S. dan A. Zouari. 2010. Efficient Structure versus Market Power: Theories and Empirical Evidence. Inter national Journal of Economics and Finance 2(4):151-166.

Mokhtar,H.S.Ahmad.,N.Abdullah, danS. M. Alhabshi. 2008. Efficiency and Market Structure, Conduct and Competition Of Islamic Banking In Malaysia.Humanomics24(1): 28-48.

Mlambo, K. dan M. Ncube. 2014. Competition and Efficiency in the Banking Sector in South Africa. African Development Review23(1): 4–15.

Mulyaningsih, T dan A.Daly. 2011. Competitive Conditions In Banking Industri: An Empirical Analysis of The Consolidation, Competition And Concentration In The Indonesia Banking Industri Between 2001 And 2009. Buletin Ekonomi, Moneter dan PerbankanBank Indonesia 14(2):151-185.

Naylah, M. 2010. Pengaruh Struktur Pasar Terhadap Kinerja Industri Perbankan Indonesia. Tesis Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Dipenogoro.

Rettab, B,.H.Kashani.,L.Obay.dan A.Rao. 2010. Impact of Market Power and Efficiency on Performance of Banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council Coun- tries. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics. Euro Journals Publishing, Inc50:190-203.

Rinkevičiūtė, Vdan R. Martinkutė-kaulienė. 2014. Impact Of Market Concentration On The Profitability Of Lithuanian Banking Sector. Business: Theory and Practice, 15(3): 254–260.

Samad, A. 2008. Market Structure, Conduct and Performance: Evidence From the Bangladesh Banking Industry. Journal of Asian Economics19(2):181-193.

Sanuri. 2011. Pembuktian Paradigma Structure Conduct Performace atau Hipotesis Efficient Structure Dalam Industri Perbankan Indonesia. Tesis. Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Sathye, M. 2005. Market Structure and Performance in Australian Banking. Review of Accounting and Finance 4(2): 107-122.

Spulbăr, C. dan M. Niţoi. 2014. Determinants Of Bank Cost Efficiency In Transition Economies: Evidence For Latin America, Central And Eastern Europe And South-East Asia. Applied Economics46(16): 1940–1952.

Tajgardoon, G., M. Behname., dan K. Noormohamadi. 2012. Is Profitability as a result of Market Power or Efficiency in Islamic Banking Industri? Economics and Finance Review2(5): 01-07.

Ye, Q., X. Zongling dan D. Fang. 2012. Market Structure, Performance, And Efficiency of The Chinese Banking Sector.Econ Change Restruct45: 337–358.

Zhu, J. 2014. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: DEA with Spreadsheets 2nd ed. Springer. New York.

Published

2018-09-06

Issue

Section

Artikel