AKUNTANSI FORENSIK: TELAAH EMPIRIS PENERAPAN DALAM KURIKULUM AKUNTANSI

Authors

  • Zaenal Fanani Departemen Akuntansi-Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis-Universitas Airlangga
  • Clarina Widyati Gunawan Departemen Akuntansi-Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis-Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2020.v4.i2.3952

Keywords:

forensic accounting, relevance of teaching, teaching benefits, obstacles teaching, teaching materials, learning mechanisms

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to determine whether there are differences in the application of the teaching of forensic accounting in the accounting curriculum. This study uses a simple random sampling by distributing questionnaires for accounting lecturer in public and private universities with accreditation A. Observation data obtained as many as 63. The variables used were the relevance of teaching, teaching benefits, obstacles teaching, teaching materials, and learning mechanisms. Analysis techniques using Independent Sample T Test. The results showed that there is a difference between public and private universities in terms of teaching the relevance, benefits of teaching, teaching materials and learning mechanisms forensic accounting and there is no difference between public and private universities for teaching barriers forensic accounting.

References

Anshori, Muslich dan Sri Iswati. 2009. Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Surabaya: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Airlangga

Carpenter, T. D., Durtschi, C., & Gaynor, L. M. 2011. The incremental benefits of a forensic accounting course on skepticism and fraud-related judgments. Issues in Accounting Education, 26 (1): 1-21

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. 2002. Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Asdi Mahasatya

Efiong, E. J. 2012. Forensic accounting education: An exploration of level of awareness in developing economies-Nigeria as a case study. International Journal of business and management, 7 (4): 26

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. 1983. Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California management review, 25 (3): 88-106

Ghozali, Imam. 2006. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Ghozali, Imam dan Anis Chariri. 2007. Teori Akuntansi. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro

Hidayat, S. E., & Al-Hadrami, A. H. 2015. Forensic Accounting Education In Bahrain: A Survey on Educators’ Opinion. Int. J. Ped. Inn, 3 (1)

Huber, W. 2012. Is forensic accounting in the United States becoming a profession? Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 4 (1)

Johnson-Rokosu, S. F. 2015. Integrating Forensic Accounting Core Competency into the Study of Accounting. Case of Nigeria Tertiary Institutions. Academic Journal of Economic Studies, 1 (3): 38-64

Mayangsari, S. 2012. Forensic Accounting Education: Academicians and Practitioners’view. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XV. Banjarmasin

Nazir, Moh. 2005. Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia

Novia, Windy. 2006. Kamus Lengkap Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Kashiko

Ozkul, F.U., & Pamukcu, A. 2012. Fraud Detection and Forensic Accounting Emerging Fraud pp.(19-41): Springer

Qodar, Nafiysul. 2015. Cek di Sini, 137.005 Siswa Lulus SNMPTN 2015. (http://news.liputan6.com/read/2229185/cek-di-sini-137005-siswa-lulus-snmptn-2015, diakses 8 Januari 2016)

Rezaee, Z., Lander, G. H., & Gavin, T. A. 1992. Forensic accounting in the Curriculum. Managerial Auditing Journal, 7 (3)

Rezaee, Z., Crumbley, D. L. and Elmore, R.C. 2004. Forensic Accounting Education: A Survey of Academicians and Practitioners. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 6: 193-231

Santoso, Singgih. 2005. Mengatasi Berbagai Masalah Statistik Dengan SPSS Versi 11.5 Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Sayyid, A. 2013. Fraud dan Akuntansi Forensik (Upaya Minimalisasi Kecurangan dan Rekayasa Keuangan). Jurnal At-Taradhi, 4 (1)

Singleton, T. W., and A. J. Singleton. 2006. Fraud Auditing and Forensic Accounting. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Sugianto dan Jiantari. 2014. Akuntansi Forensik: Perlukah Ada dalam Kurikulum Jurusan Akuntansi? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 5 (3): 355-364

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Suhernita, Efa Yonnedi, dan Verni Juita. 2012. Pengajaran Akuntansi Forensik di Indonesia: Persepsi Akademisi dan Auditor di Sumatera Barat. Konferensi Nasional Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia. Malang

Syah, Muhibin. 2002. Psikologi Pendidikan Suatu Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: Rosdakarya

Tunakotta, Theodorus M. 2010. Akuntansi Forensik &Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Umar, Husein. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.

Widiyani, Rosmha. 2015. Biaya Operasional PTN 2016 Rp 5,5 T. (http://www.harnas.co/2015/10/15/biaya-operasional-ptn-2016-rp-55-t, diakses 8 Januari 2016).

Wijatno, Serian. 2009. Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi Secara Efisien, Efektif, dan Ekonomis Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan dan Mutu Lulusan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Zamira, A. K., & Darsono, D. 2014. Persepsi Akademisi dan Praktisi Akuntansi terhadap Akuntansi Forensik sebagai Profesi Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 3 (3): 1-13

Published

2020-08-01

Issue

Section

Artikel