Titik Setyaningsih, Antin Okfitasari


Tax amnesty program was obtain to apply Republic Indonesia government regulation number 11 year 2016. The present study aims at providing why do tax payers take tax amnesty. This study used Case Study Research approach. A single case study approach was choosen because one data was enough to achieve the research objective. Data were gathered by questionnaire and semi-structured interview with tax payers in Solo Raya. The finding shows that comprehension of tax amnesty only can be understood three of tax payers, they take tax amnesty program by working together with tax consultant, and the problems are for arranging technical and minim for socialization become obstruction of tax amnesty realization. The limitation of this research is not using comparative case study. In addition, this research timming is limited. However this research raises the higher of leader or personal commitment to do tax amnesty program with the hope by increasing regular tax amnesty socialization, simplification of procedure tax amnesty for small business tax payers, also if tax amnesty results, the tax money, actually were used for public wealthy.

Kata Kunci

tax amnesty; single case study; commitment

Teks Lengkap:



Alm, J., J. Martinez-Vazquez dan S. Wallace. 2009. Do Tax Amnesties Work? The Revenue Effects of Tax Amnesties During the Transition in the Russian Federation. Economic Analysis and Policy. 39(2): 235–253.

Avi-Yonah, R. S dan Y. Margalioth. 2007. Taxation in Developing Countries: Some Recent Support and Challenges to the Conventional View. Tax & Development, Review 27(1): 1-32.

Azmi, A. A. C dan K. A. Perumal. 2008. Tax Fairness Dimensions In An Asian Context: The Malaysian Perspective International Review of Business Research Papers 4(5): 11-19

Bagiada dan Darmayasa. 2016. Tax Amnesty Upaya Membangun Kepatuhan Sukarela. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi 5 Makasar: 1-24

Bawazier, F. 2011. Reformasi Pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Legesi Indonesia 8(1): 1–12.

Boniello, G., G. Polacco., F. Florenzano., & S. Jarrett. 2003. Italian Tax Amnesty is Back But on Tougher Terms. Journal of International Taxation 14(4): 47–51.

Creswell, J. W. 2010. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Terj. Achmad Fawaid dari judul aslinya “Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach.” Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Damayanti, D. 2016. Mengapa Harus Ikut Amnesti Pajak. Diakses tanggal 14 Desember 2016.

Darmayasa, I. N., and R. Y. Aneswari. 2015a. The ethical practice of tax consultant based on local culture. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211(September): 142–148.

Darmayasa, I. N., dan Y. R. Aneswari. 2015b. Paradigma Interpretif Pada Penelitian Akuntansi Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma 6(5).

Darussalam. 2014. Tax Amnesty dalam Rangka Rekonsiliasi Nasional. Inside Tax, 26: 15-19

Dul, J. dan H. Tony. 2008. Case Study Methodology in Business Research Published by Elsevier Ltd. USA.

Gilham, B. 2000. Case Study Research Methods. First Edition, British Library.

Hancock, D. R dan A. Bob 2006. Doing Case Study Research: a Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.

Harun. 2008. Evaluasi Empiris Terhadap Kapasitas Suatu Pemerintah Daerah dalam Implementasi Standar Akuntansi Berbasis Akrual. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Bisnis 8(2): 113-122.

Ilyas, W. B. dan R. Burton. 2010. Perpajakan Indonesia. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Julianto, P. A. 2016. Ditjen Pajak Apresiasi UMKM yang Ikut Tax Amnesty Diakses tanggal 5 Oktober 2016.

Le Borgne, E. 2006. Economic and Political Determinants of Tax Amnesties in the U.S. States (No. 222).

Malherbe, J. 2011. Tax Amnesties. Kluwer Law International BV, The Netherlands.

Mardiasmo, 2010. Perpajakan. Penerbit Andi. Yogyakarta.

Nar, M. 2015. The Effects of Behavioral Economics on Tax Amnesty. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 5(2): 580-589.

Ngadiman dan D. Huslin. 2015. Pengaruh Sunset Policy, Tax Amnesty, dan Sanksi Pajak terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak (Studi Empiris di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Jakarta Kembangan). Jurnal Akuntansi 19(2): 225-241

Peter, K. S, S. Buttrick, dan D. Duncan. 2010. Global Reform Of Personal Income Taxation, 1981–2005: Evidence From 189 Countries. National Tax Journal 63(3): 447–478.

Prastowo, A. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Rancangan Penelitian. Cetakan II, Ar Ruzz Media. Yogyakarta.

Prastowo, Y. 2016. Repatriasi Aset Akan Sulit Dijaring Mayoritas Aset di Dalam Negeri. Jakarta. Harian Kompas, p. 17.

Rakhmindyarto. 2011. Evaluating the Sunset Policy in Indonesia. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities 2(1): 198–214.

Ragimun. 2014. Analisis Implementasi Pengampunan Pajak (Tax Amnesty) di Indonesia. Badan Kebijakan Fiskal Kementrian Keuangan Republik Indonesia.

Saracoglu, O. F. dan E. Çaskurlu. 2011. Tax Amnesty with Effects and Effecting Aspects: Tax Compliance, Tax Audits and Enforcements Around; The Turkish Case International Journal of Business and Social Science 2(7): 95-103.

Sayidah, N. 2015. Pandangan Terhadap Tax Amnesty Sebuah Temuan Awal. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Perpajakan (SNP) 5. Universitas Trunojoyo.

Sekaran, U. dan R. Bougie. 2010. Research Method for Business, A Skill Building Approach. Fifth Edition. John Willey & Son Inc. New York.

Torgler, B. 2003. The Importance of Faith: Tax Morale and Religiosity. Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA). 08: 1–35.

Torgler, B., and C. A. Schaltegger. 2005. Tax Amnesties and Political Participation. Public Finance Review 33(3): 403–431.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 11 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pengampunan Pajak.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No 16 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Keempat Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 1983 Tentang Ketentuan Umum Dan Tata Cara Perpajakan Menjadi Undang-Undang.


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.